Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From rational CT DEMS: On Lying To Your Constituents To Win An Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 06:07 PM
Original message
From rational CT DEMS: On Lying To Your Constituents To Win An Election
It is refreshing to hear from progressive DEMS in CT their feelings on all the yukky attention Joe is getting. Yes, there were CT DEMS that did not swallow the Loserman kool-aid....

In particular, the notion that if Joe switches, there will be calls for his resignation. Follow this link for a detailed reviews of Loserman lies and misrepresentations (to get elected):

My Left Nutmeg
2/22/07

http://www.myleftnutmeg.com/frontPage.do

* * * * *

Damn, how great would it have been to have elected Ned Lamont - all this Loserman bullshit would be a non-issue... :grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heard that Ned is gonna run against Chris Shays
The last Republican House member in New England
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Where did you hear this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Rumour floating around MyDD awhile ago
Don't know if I can pull the link up now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. since he's an independent, why would switching who he caucuses with be a
reason for anyone to get the knickers twisted? it asin't like he was camoflaged or something. all ya had to do listen to the SOB to know where he stood. buncha dumb mofos voted for a republican war hawk and now they say they din't know it? funny. the rest of the nation did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC