Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Michigan doesn't count, WHY is CNN putting it for Clinton then?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:34 AM
Original message
If Michigan doesn't count, WHY is CNN putting it for Clinton then?
Check out CNN's home page:

www.cnn.com

They have the following for the Dem candidates:

Democrats, States Won, Del
Obama, IA, 25
Clinton, MI, NH, 24
Edwards, -, 18

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. To create a sense of momentum...
...Most people don't follow closely enough to know what the hell was going on with Michigan or the fact that they don't get delegates. So all the media needs to do is create a "CLINTON WON MICHIGAN!!!" vibe and it gives her the momentum they want her to have going into the other primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. How about a category of Delegates from states too uppity for Howard Dean
Or "Too urban"

or "Too black"

or "Too hispanic"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's more like the DLC has corrupted Michigan into stupidity. It has nothing to do with
Dean. MI DLCers broke the rules to give favor to Clinton (a DLCer) and to drive a wedge into the party. Same with Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was an election, whether or not delegates are awarded.
It certainly provided some sense of who Michigan supports.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Since she was the only one on the ballot
That's a bit of a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. There were 3 candidates on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. She was not the only one on the ballot
Dennis Kucinich, Christopher Dodd, and Mike Gravel were also on the ballot. Kucinich got a whopping 4%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Dodd is out of the race, Kucinich tried to get his name off the ballot. Gravel is insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Kucinich actually campaigned in Michigan:
January 15, 2008
Kucinich Pitches Higher-Education Plan to Wolverines

During a campaign stop yesterday at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, the Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich sought to sell students on his plan to make a college education free for anyone who then goes to work for the government.

The Michigan Daily reports that Mr. Kucinich characterized his education plan as distinguishing him from other candidates, and challenged his opponents to commit to offer tuition-free college educations. “If students go out there and vote for me, they’ll send a message: Start talking about education,” he said.

more: http://chronicle.com/blogs/election/1436/kucinich-pitches-higher-education-plan-to-wolverines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not when nearly half the votes were uncommitted. Having real choices on the ballot
Would have made a difference to voters. The DLC has corrupted this state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The error was the other candidates removing their names.
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 09:04 AM by Tesha
There should have been an agreement that either
everyone removed their names from the ballot
(effectively canceling the election) or everyone
stayed on the ballot.

Instead, Clinton (typically) punked them all,
but it was still an election, whether in the
style of a banana republic or not.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. So basically, Clinton Cheated? No surprise there. She's been using Rovian tactics all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. That's what it's really about isn't it?
You don't give a shit about rules or that a whole state was just told to fuck off. You just don't like that Clinton got a lay up. I voted for Kucinich yesterday, but I appreciate that Clinton didn't participate in this cowardly lynching of Michigan's vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Because...she got the most votes? i thought that's how it works...
At least when Edwards got a fraction of a percent more than Hillary in Iowa couldn't be stopped from saying: "I came in second! I beat Hillary!" every chance he got
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Because... she was the only major candidate on the ballot more like it. And she broke party rules
as well by not removing her name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Which specific rule did she break?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. The Dem candidates agreed to bypass Michigan since it broke the rules... Hillary didn't
Read it and weep:


http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/09/michigan.primary/index.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Five Democratic presidential candidates Tuesday sought to officially withdraw from Michigan's January 15 primary, rendering the event virtually insignificant.

Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, and Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio all announced the move Tuesday, the deadline for filing such paperwork.

Under Democratic National Committee rules, only Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina are allowed to hold primaries before February 5.


Apparently, Clinton doesn't respect DNC rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. You still haven't cited the rule
Under Democratic National Committee rules, only Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina are allowed to hold primaries before February 5.

What does the rule say that candidates are allowed/not allowed/required to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. She is not agreeing to DNC rules by staying on the ballot of a primary that is invalid.
Like it or not, she is validating the Michigan primary and therefore agreeing that the DNC rules were OK to break. She did not agree with the other Dems to pull out of the election. She is a total Rovian hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Did the DNC rules require candidates to withdraw their names, or simply prohibit them from
campaigning in the state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. If party rules dictate disenfranchising millions of Democrats
then fuck party rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. It's the Michigan DNC (aka DLC) disenfranchising voters. Not the DNC.
They are the ones that moved the primary and broke the rules, not the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Yeah yeah I've seen you pimp that shit all over these threads
and it doesn't smell any better after the tenth time reading it. The decision was the DNC's, and these arbitrary rules do NOT justify robbing millions of people of their vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. give me a break....fuck the rules?
because the party enforces it`s rules you say fuck them? if they did`t there would`t be a party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I trust you support the death penalty for jaywalking.
Stop acting like they're standing up for some noble principle. What they're doing is depriving millions of people a voice in an election because they don't like anyone challenging the primacy of two small and nonrepresentative states. So yeah. Fuck them. Give you a break? Fuck that too. How about giving a break to Michigan and Florida Democrats who were just summarily thrown in the trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. You did notice the delegate count did not change, right?
Clinton should have gotten a lot of grief for keeping her name on the ballot there, considering that Michigan clearly violated the rules established by the National Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdale Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. I disagree
The candidates who took their names off the ballot deserve the grief. If the Dem candidate is anyone but Hillary, he will have a rough time winning MI because of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. This has nothing to do with Michigan voters... but rather the State MI Dem Party. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
17. if there is one lesson to learn from last night
is that the media controls this election. it tells us who to vote for and what the outcome is going to be. there is no reason at all to include michigan but they do because they expect you to believe. do you really care what any talking asshole says about who won or any focus group after the debate. it`s a dog show where they parade the candidate in front of our tv screens and they expect us to decide.

hillary did`t win anything, none of those "numbers" have any creditability,and if we believe them then we deserve what they tell us to believe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. and who controls the media?
Hill's new/old best pals! The Corporations she has been working for these last few decades.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
29. Cause She Won. The Election Wasn't Cancelled. Makes Sense To Me.
I'm amazed though that Kucinich still only managed 4%. I think that kind of says something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC