Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clintons caught taking millions from Nuclear lobbyists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:10 PM
Original message
Clintons caught taking millions from Nuclear lobbyists
BWAAAAhhhhhhha
That big liar Hillary gets caught slaming Edwards and Obama about Yucca mountain, and her campaign took 10,000 from Nuclear lobbyist and Big Dog got 170 million from them.....

She is toast again.
You think Taylor Marsh will have this on her website.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://ruralvotes.com/thefield/

As the conference call was underway, Obama press secretary Bill Burton sent out an email memo that can only be described as an atomic second strike: Among the charges are that NRG Energy corp. – the first corporation in the US to apply for a new nuclear power plant license since the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident in Pennsylvania – gave $10,000, through its PAC, to Senator Clinton in 2007 and – here’s a whopper - the corporation donated $175 million dollars to the Clinton Global Initiative of former president Bill Clinton.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is her alleged lie?
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:17 PM by rodeodance


.......That big liar Hillary gets caught slaming Edwards and Obama about Yucca mountain, and her campaign took 10,000 from Nuclear lobbyist and Big Dog got 170 million from them.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. You need to put "Reagan" in your title if you want more views.
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 02:16 PM by skipos
That is the #1 most important issue to voters right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL...good one n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. what about my question? Why did you call Sen. Clinton a lier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I note the poster takes time to respond to you but then runs and hides from a serious question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, you think their donation to
a good cause (Clinton Global Initiative) should be turned down?

"President Bill Clinton launched the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) in 2005 as a non-partisan catalyst for action, bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.

As a non-profit, 501(c)(3) endeavor of the William J. Clinton Foundation, CGI draws strength from a highly diverse membership base that represents the full spectrum of political, ideological, religious, ethnic, and geographic backgrounds. Members include current and former heads of state, top business executives, preeminent scholars, and representatives of key non-governmental organizations working together for a common cause."

http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/NETCOMMUNITY/Page.aspx?pid=1367&srcid=1399
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Oh give me a break! You think they did not expect something in return????
It is amazing how blind some people can be when it comes to alternative means of moving $$$ to a politician's 'pet cause' in exchange for future favors.

Do you think that the hundreds of millions of $$$ that have been donated by corporations to the various Presidential Libraries was just altruistic? Really, do you think those donors were just acting as 'good citizens' and looking for nothing in return?

Well that might be the case if those donations were a matter of public identification, but Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II, saw to it that those who made the huge donations were allowed to remain anonymous.

Does that bother you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. They just want good government.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. All kinds of corporations and industries
contribute to charitable causes. Do you really think the charities are going to refuse money because they don't like the industry? Why does any business contribute money to a cause?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Why does any business contribute money to a charitable cause SECRETLY? Hmmm???
THe Presidential Library contribution scheme is a giant slush fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. We weren't discussing the presidential libraries.....
why are you changing the subject?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Why won't you answer the question? Why are they contributing SECRETLY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. You need to give me some examples of what you are talking about.
I can't read your mind and you are changing the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. And how much has Edwards taken?
Zero.

I doubt Obama is clean on this one either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Obama is dead wrong on nuclear
although lately he has tried to obfiscate his true pro nuclear position.If this guy gets in watch out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well well well..........
As the conference call was underway, Obama press secretary Bill Burton sent out an email memo that can only be described as an atomic second strike: Among the charges are that NRG Energy corp. – the first corporation in the US to apply for a new nuclear power plant license since the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident in Pennsylvania – gave $10,000, through its PAC, to Senator Clinton in 2007 and – here’s a whopper - the corporation donated $175 million dollars to the Clinton Global Initiative of former president Bill Clinton.

That Clinton Global Intitiative sure does get around. I have to check it to see if it got any money from the hotels that stole the beachfront property from the tsunami victims. That's for the tip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. AHA! So THAT's what "agnostic" on nuclear energy means -- highest bidder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. More lies from liars who hate the Clintons.
Unless there is a source other than this PAC's own oficial one, there is no record of NRG Energy Group's PAC giving one red cent to Hillary. See for yourself:

http://www3.capwiz.com/msnbc/bio/fec/?commid=C00366559

And as for any money they may have donated to the Clinton Global Initiative, how in the wide world of sports can anyone but a 40-foot-wingspan wingnut see anything wrong with an ex-president using his influence to try to raise funds from all SORTS of corporations, in hopes of reducing world poverty and hunger?

Bush administration types feel that they have to be against anything Clinton was for. So, since Clinton is for allieviating world suffering, the Bush Administration has to be for PROMOTING it, and they're doing quite a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Caught taking" $175 million...
Without even researching this, I can say that $175 million does not go unnoticed so it could not be anything the Clintons were trying to hide and inadvertently got "caught taking."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. IP'er loves sensationalist dwadle--then runs away-also called her a lier but will not say why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC