annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 04:45 PM
Original message |
MSNBC reporting that ACLU says optical scan voting machines are unconstitutional!? |
|
WTF!! Has anyone heard anything about this?
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message |
2rth2pwr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Didn't they also say that sex in bathroom stalls is private? nt |
endarkenment
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
did you have a point?
Do you have an expectation that taking a dump in a stall is a private activity?
|
2rth2pwr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Is that what it's called these days? nt |
Fredda Weinberg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
4. precinct based scanners should be mandatory |
|
that's all that's required to satisfy the ACLU
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Some scanners alert voters to errors. Apparently the Diebold/Premier scanners don't... |
|
In NH, 500+ ballots were not counted due to the wrong type of pen being used.
|
Fredda Weinberg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-17-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. The scanners have a setting. The operators control it. Again, don't |
|
blame the manufacturer when circumstances don't warrant.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |