Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Telecom immunity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 10:59 AM
Original message
Telecom immunity
why do so many demand telecom immunity?

what crimes are being hidden?
what precedent are they trying to set?
could they be more transparent at favoring corporations over favoring civil rights?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Harry Reid is a bastard for putting forward the FISA bill with telecom immunity attached.
There were two versions, one with and one without. He had to put the one with immunity attached on the floor for debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. harry reid
is a sell out piece of dog shit that should be tarred and feathered. He is not a dem and he is doing everything he can to stop these dems from actually making a differance. He is a big part in this "do nothing" congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. in short
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 11:06 AM by fenriswolf
alot of them
that corporations have free reign to do what they want
your kidding right? corporations trump civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. corporations trump civil rights
is the biggest issue on the table for me

I think most of our problems can be laid at that altar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. It always comes down to:
$$$.

Settlements could be in the $billions. The telcos have their lobby machine running in all-out disaster mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I understand that dollars are at stake
though more than likely it would be something stupid like coupons or discounts on future services the way so many of the class action suits have gone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I am sure they will do their best to weasel out of a cash payment
but here's the thing: no immunity means no criminal immunity either. If the public gets behind this there could be indictments in the future.

Time to draw the line on personal privacy. The spying is out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think there's no chance in hell of criminal prosecution
no matter which party is in control of government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You may be right
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 11:25 AM by wtmusic
but IMO it's amazing that immunity is still an issue at all.

A grassroots public outcry has thrown a monkey wrench into the gears. Hard not to be optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loftlore Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. Don't let Phone Companies OFF THE HOOK!
I urge the Senate to reject retroactive amnesty for telecommunications companies. These companies committed crimes, pure and simple. They used their position of trust and privilege to spy on Americans. They did this without warrants. If any Senator or Congressional Representative is EVER going to campaign on being tough on crime, I don't see how they can support amnesty for phone companies. How can these violations of American rights be forgiven? The phone companies MUST be punished. If not, our very freedom is at risk! The phone company amnesty bill is an abomination and it must be squashed!

The National Security Agency directed these warrantless surveillance on Americans. If the surveillance of innocent Americans is not to be considered spying, can anyone explain to me why a spy agency directed the covert operation? Remember, the Bush Administration denied that the spying ever happened! Do criminals ever lie about their crimes? The answer is obvious.

The spying included the records and content of private DOMESTIC communications. Millions of ordinary, innocent Americans were victimized. What's next, a listening device in every living room, a camera in every restroom? It's 1984, people.

Last night, during the Bush swan-song State of the Union address, Democrats sat on their hands much of the time. Their greatest silence was earned when President Bush demanded that phone companies be forgiven their crimes. Republicans, amongst them the leading Congressional neo-con Candice Miller, were all for letting phone companies off the hook. Rep. Miller even had time to shake the hand of George Bush when the last-gasp event was over. Who knows how deep the neo-cons self-interest goes in demanding amnesty for phone company crimes?

If George Bush is concerned about criminal charges against those involved in spying on Americans he has the option of pardoning every last one of them. Instead he's asking Congress to do his dirty work for him. Typical.

Senators! Congressional Representatives! Do not back Bush by allowing phone companies to escape their criminal acts! Do not forgive! Do not forget!

http://www.loftlore.com/blog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. What did he say about immunity?
Couldn't watch, I get ill.

Searched the text for "immunity", "phone", etc. but no luck.

(welcome to DU)

:bounce: :toast: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC