Staph
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:51 PM
Original message |
|
Either Russert or Scarborough, in discussion of who would be the logical front-runner in 2012 other than Romney, said Lindsey Graham would be the candidate to watch. And the other guy (Russert or Scarborough) agreed.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
I think the future looks mighty rosy for Democratic presidential victories!
|
| TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. That just goes to show they know NOTHING about the Repub party-- |
|
Lady Lindsey is LOATHED by the base, and his, er, "orientation" is suspect. Not a killer in the Dem party, but a wide-stancer is NOT going to be a Repub Preznit.
|
| Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. They also know nothing if they think Romney is a logical front-runner. |
|
Mitt is hated by very wide segments of the Republican Party as well. He was the default for those who couldn't stand McCain and Huckabee.
|
| shaniqua6392
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Republicans will never nominate a homosexual. |
| Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. I'll bet the wife and the 5 sons started to get nervous |
|
about getting anything when the old boy kicks off. He'll be back in 2012, like a bad penny, but only as long as he can do it on other people's money.
Yes, I'm cranky.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed May 01st 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
