Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Prosecutors Want DeLay Charge Reinstated" He's Baaaaaaack!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 02:52 PM
Original message
"Prosecutors Want DeLay Charge Reinstated" He's Baaaaaaack!
Prosecutors Want DeLay Charge Reinstated
By KELLEY SHANNON, Associated Press Writer

AUSTIN, Texas - Prosecutors attempting to restore a conspiracy charge against former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay argued Wednesday that the "plain language" of Texas law means he can be charged with conspiring to violate the election code.

But lawyers for DeLay and two co-defendants told the Court of Criminal Appeals the law is clear in their view _ that conspiracy was added to the state election code after prosecutors allege the crime happened.

"Historically, there have been limitations on the use of conspiracy laws," said DeLay's attorney, Dick DeGuerin of Houston.

Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle's office is appealing lower court rulings that threw out the charge accusing DeLay and Republican fundraisers Jim Ellis and John Colyandro of conspiring to violate the Texas election code and its ban on corporate campaign contributions.

It could be weeks or months before the appeals court makes a decision.<snip>

http://www.comcast.net/news/politics/index.jsp?cat=POLITICS&fn=/2007/01/24/569786.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm no lawyer, but Delay may have a point here.
lawyers and "plain language" are like matter and anti-matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. When Ambiguity Exists, New Laws Are Passed To Clarify Meaning of Original Law....
... Just because there was a later statute enacted which 'clarified' the scope of the original statute does not mean that a conspiracy charge could not be brought under the original statute.

The 'plain language' argument is one of judicial interpretation. Basically it means that plain language on its face will mean exactly what it says without further clarification.

Where conduct is outlawed by a criminal statute, conspiracy to commit that conduct is always possible.

This is Texas we are looking at, but even there it is possible that the 'plain language' of the charging statute will be upheld and the charges reinstated against Delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC