Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stop using the word "internets" (plural). Fool, you're playing into the hands of dark forces!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:37 PM
Original message
Stop using the word "internets" (plural). Fool, you're playing into the hands of dark forces!
What makes the Internet so revolutionary is it's unity with the whole world. It is a symbol of humanity's oneness.

It may be "cute" to poke fun at the dork who said it first but it seems to be catching on and my sensitivity meters are peaking.

Consider that those who want to control access *and* content would love to carve it up into parts to sell off and raise prices. We are already contending with government censorship in less-than-free countries. These are inroads to making it yet another capitalist commodity with infrastructure to control access and content. Remember the mantra - "divide and conquer". They know it and use it.

Remember, there is the public network and then there are private networks. The Internet is the public network and should remain singular for the sake of our future. Let's not be lulled into accepting the concept of more than one.

So stop stop this little, innocent play with words before it festers into an uncontrollable conceptual framework. Nip it in the bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. We're poking fun at something Junior once said.
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 02:42 PM by Lasher
Seems like harmless fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. You can't be series111!!11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was funny for about a week.
But I have gotten so tired of people saying "Internets", "morans", "stategery", "hugh", "series"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. well then you're just screwn aren't you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. needs to hang up the interphones and go outside
all three
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. you mean "outsides"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. the internets are
a series of tubes.......


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Technically there are more than one internets.
The split started in 83 when ARPANET and MILNET were split. Consider the internet we are all wasting our time on one of at least two separate global internets. The DOD maintains SIPRNET and it is separate from our lovely little waste of bandwidth. Quite likely the Chinese and the Russians and perhaps some other folks do something similar.

besides I like to make fun of that freaking evil bastard moran at every opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I would define SIPRNET as a "private" network
It's not something everyone is invited to, so despite its global reach I wouldn't consider it to be what the "Internet" is as it's used in common language. Every large telcom has near global reach but they are privately controlled as well. The DOD has created its own telcom under its wing, internally managed, intersecting with every telcom player.

But "the Internet" is public and it's most redeeming assets, in my opinion, is that it connects people globally on "one" network. Physically, no. But logically, yes.

I can't speak the name of b*sh without a disparaging remark close to follow either. It's just that historically, everything the guy touches gets corrupted. We are defined by our words and our perception is colored by the concepts we hold. The use of the word "internets" seemed harmless at first. But it's spreading. I hear it everyday on the radio and in conversation. Mainly as a jibe against the originating jerk. However, there are a lot of well-moneyed interests who would love to cut up what little connection there is we share.

Call me paranoid but evil always enters with a smile and a dime through the door of triviality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It is a separate network of networks, an internet.
It is not one single network. It has all the infrastructure for routing and naming that is required to link multiple networks together, it is just off limits to us perps. So there is the internet which is the public global network of networks, and then there are other internets, like SIPRNET, which are also global networks of networks, just not public.

Technically the evil moran was correct when he said internets, but that was an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Those trucks full of tubes are driving me nuts.
That's something I really wish we could nip in the bud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Keep it up..and I may have to alert the spocksman.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don't get your meme's in a twist
All your base belong to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Itsa SERIES1! of TOOBS! ... Heh heh... a foo cayn't git fooed agayne!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC