Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Capitalism in an Apocalyptic Mood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:13 AM
Original message
Capitalism in an Apocalyptic Mood
from FPIF, via AlterNet:




Capitalism in an Apocalyptic Mood

By Walden Bello, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted February 25, 2008.

Yes, global capitalism may be resilient. But it looks like its options are increasingly limited.




Skyrocketing oil prices, a falling dollar, and collapsing financial markets are the key ingredients in an economic brew that could end up in more than just an ordinary recession. The falling dollar and rising oil prices have been rattling the global economy for sometime. But it is the dramatic implosion of financial markets that is driving the financial elite to panic.

And panic there is. Even as it characterized Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke's deep cuts amounting to a 1.25 points off the prime rate in late January as a sign of panic, the Economist admitted that "there is no doubt that this is a frightening moment." The losses stemming from bad securities tied up with defaulted mortgage loans by "subprime" borrowers are now estimated to be in the range of about $400 billion. But as the Financial Times warned, "the big question is what else is out there" at a time that the global financial system "is wide open to a catastrophic failure." In the last few weeks, for instance, several Swiss, Japanese, and Korean banks have owned up to billions of dollars in subprime-related losses. The globalization of finance was, from the beginning, the cutting edge of the globalization process, and it was always an illusion to think that the subprime crisis could be confined to U.S. financial institutions, as some analysts had thought.

Some key movers and shakers sounded less panicky than resigned to some sort of apocalypse. At the global elite's annual week-long party at Davos in late January, George Soros sounded positively necrological, declaring to one and all that the world was witnessing "the end of an era." World Economic Forum host Klaus Schwab spoke of capitalism getting its just desserts, saying, "We have to pay for the sins of the past." He told the press, "It's not that the pendulum is now swinging back to Marxist socialism, but people are asking themselves, 'What are the boundaries of the capitalist system?' They think the market may not always be the best mechanism for providing solutions."

Ruined Reputations and Policy Failures

While some appear to have lost their nerve, others have seen the financial collapse diminish their stature.

As chairman of President Bush's Council of Economic Advisers in 2005, Ben Bernanke attributed the rise in U.S. housing prices to "strong economic fundamentals" instead of speculative activity. So is it any wonder why, as Federal Reserve chairman, he failed to anticipate the housing market's collapse stemming from the subprime mortgage crisis? His predecessor, Alan Greenspan, however, has suffered a bigger hit, moving from iconic status to villain in the eyes of some. They blame the bubble on his aggressively cutting the prime rate to get the United States out of recession in 2003 and restraining it at low levels for over a year. Others say he ignored warnings about aggressive and unscrupulous mortgage originators enticing "subprime" borrowers with mortgage deals they could never afford. .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/workplace/77596/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another nasty confirmation of the fucking mess we are in and will play hell getting out of without
crippling circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. read "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein, Apocalypse is the goal, so Utopia can rise from the ashes
the Milton Friedman megalomaniac NeoCon economists are bat shit crazy their system failed in Argentina/Chile/Uruguay/Peru/Guatemala/El Salvador/Iraq but they keep try'n to get it right.. they are so insane and dangerous they need to all be put in mental institutions to protect the earth and all the people on it, it would also bee good to keep them from breeding.. lord help us if their murderous insanity is genetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yup. I'm about 3/4 of the way through it......
..... But I keep having to take breaks, because the anger and "WTF?!" from reading it can be a bit overwhelming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
againes654 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Me too!!!!
That book has been a real eye opener for me. I don't have a great understanding of economics, but I never realized how big a factor it has played world wide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I am a couple of chapters into it. I too am finding that I can only
take it a little of it at a time.

Egads! ... I was asleep for way too long. I guess I can thank the shrub for waking me up. Nahhhhh...Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. What you said.
Everyone needs to read that book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. One thing for sure they do breed. Renzi 12 kids!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Some sort of licensure
They need to have something like the medical profession has with the State Medical Boards. They have done a good job of weeding out the cranks who used to prescribe bleedings, mustard poultices, cuppings, henbane tonics, and other harmful practices. The fact that NeoCon economists are still able to prescribe their potions to a gullible populace is due to the lack of scientific evidence in economics. No one takes note of the fact that the Clinton prescription, raise taxes and balance the budget, worked wonders in the 90s. They went back to taking a swig of Bush's Magical Batshit Tax Cut Elixir to keep them healthy.

Too bad the NeoCons don't apply the same logic to their own personal health. Then we could give them all some Free Market Nightshade/Viagra Potency Pills and watch them fall over dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. prescription
But the Clinton prescription was only needed because of the excesses of Reagan. Not that it was a bad prescription for going forward, mind you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. delete. wrong subthread.
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 04:37 PM by Texas Explorer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Capitalism is too damn inefficient
It was fine as long as the planet seemed to have endless resources, cheap energy, and a great deal of natural resilience. But as everything gets tighter, it's becoming clear that capitalism is far too wasteful a system for getting anything done, that untrammeled competition leads to useless redundancy, and that capitalism inevitably tends to privatize profits and socialize costs.

It's not clear what the alternative might be, but I would guess that the answer lies somewhere in feedback mechanisms. The free market is only so-so as a feedback mechanism -- though it certainly beats Soviet-style central planning -- but somewhere in this computerized society there must be the basis for a feedback system which is slicker, faster, and more accurate. (Not to mention being less subject to gaming or to being turned into a giant casino.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Capitalism works great if you control it.
Beast of a system if you lose control over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. Capitalism is not sustainable
all resources on earth are finite and non-renewable

the earth can no longer support capitalism

people are the ONLY truly renewable resource for capitalists to exploit--that's why we have faux-slavery today, with multi-national corporations as the slave owners

the only way capitalism works is to get something for (virtually) free and turn it into something that makes money.

those days, if not over, are near an end

also near an end is the willingness of humankind to allow a few to become obscenely wealthy at the expense of everyone else and of the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. if the vast majority of home-owning middle-class americans are going to lose value in their homes...
then the monied classes are going to have to pony up their fair share this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC