Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do some people speak of cultural intolerance as "racism"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:38 AM
Original message
Poll question: Why do some people speak of cultural intolerance as "racism"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's a matter of sloppy language usage.
Most people don't like intolerance of any kind and tend to lump cultural and ethnic intolerance under one heading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can there be law enforcement without any intolerance of violation of law?
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 09:59 AM by Boojatta
I don't see how there could be a World Court unless there are laws that specify behaviors not tolerated anywhere. Some people say that the British judicial authority in India had no right to forbid the burning of a living widow along with her dead husband, that the British were practicing cultural imperialism. Yet recent proposals for the extension or reform of international law don't seem to identify any controversy involving widow burning.

Is progress towards international law reliant upon cultural imperialism of the past that effectively stamped out some practices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Clearly your thoughts about this are far more complicated than your poll would suggest.
Many cultures allow brutality that we find unthinkable. I have no idea where we should draw the line between enforcing the concept of basic human rights and interference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Racism is a bigger hammer.
It's easier for some to dismiss their opponent if they are "racist" as opposed to "culturally intolerant."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yeah but being culturally intolerant is likewise bigotry
Unless i really don't know what you guys are talking about.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Hmmm, maybe I chose poorly when I chose to use the word "intolerance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well then here's an idea. Explain yourself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. If you interpret an attitude of "intolerance" towards a particular cultural practice
to include an assumption that the opposition to the practice is based entirely on the mere fact that the practice differs from what is familiar, then you should simply refrain from making that assumption and you will probably understand what I intended to express.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Ah.
So if a person doesn't like a practice, say Japanese Whaling, He or she should be able to criticize it without being accused of being bigoted against Japanese people.

I suspect that in any extended conversation actual bigotry will pop out.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. It probably depends on the definition of culturally intolerant.
A lot of people here (myself included) are intolerant of the practice of holding a girl down and slicing off part of her clitoris. But that practice has a cultural aspect to it in certain parts of the world. Therefore, some would argue, our intolerance to this procedure is cultural intolerance. And in some cases, they might even accuse us of racism.

I can accept the cultural intolerance charge, but not the racism one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. #5 is itself an example of bigoty.
The idea that an individual must conform to and may be judged by the group is a prejudicial one. Irishmen and Poles are not required to be Catholic to be Irishmen or Poles, for example. Iranians are not necessarily Muslim. (Just so happens I had a Jewish-Iranian client once.) The individual must always be free to be himself or herself despite cultural norms.

Frankly, not all cultural practices are equally valid. Somethings are downright idiotic or even evil and if the practitioners can't see that, then I don't see what is wrong with outsiders pointing out the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. "Irishmen and Poles are not required to be Catholic"
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 10:56 AM by Boojatta
Not today, but weren't they at some times in the past required to be Catholic or suffer penalties imposed by the governing authority?

I see a problem with the concept of democracy in a world divided into jurisdictions that are separated by differences of ancestry as much as anything else. To automatically accept as legitimate any laws enforced by any democratically elected government may be to give authority to an ethnic group in a given geographical region, not just to attack other countries, but to impose its will upon dissenting members of the same ethnic group. The power comes from numbers, not from responsibility or good policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. Not in Ireland
Was a British colony for a long time so Protestantism was allowed since the time of Henry the Ocho. Always many Protestants in Ireland. It caused a lot of trouble. Perhaps you heard of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. Are you suggesting that, because you know that ...
for a long time Protestantism was allowed, you are able to conclude that there wasn't any period of time when it wasn't allowed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Inquisitive Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
55. Yes!
extreme cultural relativists drive me up the wall too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. How would...
Spencer Wells vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Two syllables in "racism"
Seven syllables in "cultural intolerance"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Two syllables?
You bigot!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. Actually I'm a writer
and I happen to notice words. When I worked in newspapers, we were always taught to use short, easily understood words instead of long windy phrases.
Most people would rather use a short word like racism than whatever multisyllable phrase was cited above.
It didn't even occur to me to think of this in racial terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. I think that's exactly it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. NOTA.
Pretty much the same reason that people will call various random conservatives and reactionaries "Nazis". It is content-free name calling.

It must be added that racism and ethnic bigotry are both forms of xenophobia, fear of those different from yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. Because they're oversensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. Uh, because racism means intolerance?!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I would think that "race" would be a significant component
in the meaning of a word like "racism."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. please tell me you are kidding... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. How about because they are the same thing.
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 12:17 PM by Usrename
I don't even know what you are talking about.

If you asked "why do some people make racial classifications that others don't make" then I might understand it a little better.

Why do you think there is a difference between racism and cultural intolerance? Both terms seem like they would be based on a belief that one group is superior or inferior to another.

Isn't that the definition of racism?

I think the major difference between xenophobia (fear of the other) and racism or cultural intolerance is that these last two are certainly learned phenomona, while we may all be born with our monkey hind-brain prewired with a certain amount of xenophobia. It actually makes some sense that this reaction would be instinctive, even though we are social animals. Hiding from strangers might have produced better survival results than greeting them, at certain times in our prehistoric past. Especially for the very young.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. not the same thing at all
not even close...

Racism is the blind belief that one RACE is superior to another. Not just some random group...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Ok, then enlighten me.
What is race, if it isn't just some random group? Of course race is arbitrary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. ok...you missed the point...
Belief that a RACE is superior or inferior to another because of RACE alone is racism. Association with some random group, like say Christians, or Muslims and the belief that THEY are superior or inferior is bigotry.

IF someone were... say to use the following groupings :

I am an African-American male who is Christian.

THEN:
Racism means you have an inherent belief that his race is inferior to yours. It would be bigotry to have a problem with him as a Christian.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I'm not missing the point at all.
You seem to think that racism and cultural intolerance are somehow different and that everyone should agree with you on what that difference is.

I argue that either of the two expressions can be defined in such an arbitrary fashion that in most cases there is no real difference.

I know you don't see what I'm talking about. You may think that genetics will decide what race the guy in your example is, or that he can self-identify his race and religion, or something and then that will be the end of it. I say it ain't all that easy. Someone else, say you or I, might see that same person in a completely different light. And we don't all have to agree. In any event, I think that in most cases a person means racist when they say racist, based on their own belief of what race is.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. i think that people should agree
based on what the definition of the words are...not what i think...

However, i can agree that most people who call something racist really mean it...they just don't understand what 'race' is. Identifying race should not be based on a belief...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. I guess I'm one of those who don't understand.
What should it be based on, if not a belief?

If you understand a different way, what is it? Why won't you say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. i DID say it
Racism is based on Race...not culture or anything else.

You said, "In any event, I think that in most cases a person means racist when they say racist, based on their own belief of what race is. " This is what I am talking about. Race is pretty well defined and does not require someone to 'believe' what race 'means'. All you have to do is find that racism is based on race. Race is defined and race is not a function of culture or religion or ritual or who you choose to associate with.

I believe racism and bigotry are real and pervasive in our culture. I also believe that people should use the correct term to describe what is happening.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Ok, you say it's well defined.
How many races are there? That should be very easy. What makes a race a race? That should be easy also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Is the same thing
A person's culture is every bit a part of their race. Why do you think some racists make the comment "he's trying to act white", etc? Its not because the person they're talking about is trying to change their skin color, its because they are imitating an aspect of someone else's culture.

Secondly, "blind belief that one RACE is superior to another" isn't the only criteria for being a racist. Intolerance and/or dislike of a person based on their skin color or their culture are equally racist, even if that person doesn't think their own race is superior.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. i am sorry...but racism is race...ism
you can have a Black man in any country in Africa and a Black man in the US. Same race. I dare you to show that they have the same culture by anything other than choice.

There are plenty of people who are bigoted against cultures and religions and political affiliations and sexual preferences...but racism is about race. Any further than that and you are redefining the word.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. And I am sorry....but
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 03:10 PM by Popol Vuh
that's not only incorrect, but, its being very narrow minded.

you can have a Black man in any country in Africa and a Black man in the US. Same race. I dare you to show that they have the same culture by anything other than choice.

Correct, but, you don't want to admit that a person's culture is equally identifying to their race as skin color is. Just because you can have people of one race or another adopting, to one degree or another, someone else's culture doesn't change the fact that culture represents race as much as skin color does.



There are plenty of people who are bigoted against cultures and religions and political affiliations and sexual preferences...but racism is about race. Any further than that and you are redefining the word.


"Racism is about race. Any further than that an you are redefining the word."

Really? Lets see then if culture isn't tired into the definition of racism:



Dictionary.com:

A belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racism



Besides culture being tied to race identification, note how the term "usually" is being used with respect to the idea of race superiority.

Like I said. Your idea is only one aspect of what is racism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. the definition you chose supports my view
so I am not sure why you posted it. Race is defined. Racism is : A belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

The underlines you added simply point out that RACISM is the BELIEF that RACE determines CULTURE or ACHIEVEMENT.

So yes, Race and Culture are tied...but not the way you are trying to indicate and not how the definition defines it...


sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. LOL... It both supports and refutes your point of view
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 03:17 PM by Popol Vuh
For the last time. You point of view is only one aspect of what racism is. I just proved that above.. Which is why I suspect you conspicuously avoided responding to how the word "usually" is used in the above definition.

n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. you really need some help with reading the english language
it does not refute my view that racism is about race...in no way does it refute that...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Which is why
You conspicuously avoided responding to how the word "usually" is used in the above definition.

For the last time. I just proved that your point of view isn't the only aspect of what racism is and that culture is tied into the word racism because its as race identifying as skin color is.

There is no further need for me to respond. I've proved my point.


n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. re-read please
A belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

The usually relates to superiority, which is one aspect of racism (that i agree with you on). The primary part of that sentence is that RACISM is about RACE...you seem to think it is about culture...while this definition would indicate that RACE DETERMINES CULTURE... not the other way around.

I believe racism and bigotry are rampant...I also believe people should use the proper term.

And dropping out...by the way, doesn't mean you proved your point...but believe that if you must.

sP

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Ok I'll try to make this as simple as I can
CULTURE is ONE identifying trait towards one's RACE. ERGO, if one is bigoted against one's CULTURE they are bigoted against that culture's RACE - CULTURE and RACE are tied together because they identify with each other.

And the fact that some people of one race or another who adopt someone else's culture doesn't change the above fact. Which is why I made the example in one of the above posts that some racists say, for example, "he's trying to act white". The racist doesn't recognize the person who's trying to "act" white because its not that person's culture. Culture is the equal factor because it identifies with race as equally as skin color does.

Race and culture identify with each other, therefor, to be bigoted against one is to be bigoted against the other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. A few questions
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 07:57 PM by Boojatta
CULTURE and RACE are tied together because they identify with each other.

What's the distinction between "tied together" and "identify with each other"? To me that sounds a bit like "the Sun is big because it's large." It sounds like repetition or begging the question, not like an explanation.

And the fact that some people of one race or another adopt someone else's culture doesn't change the above fact. Which is why I made the example in one of the above posts that some racists say, for example, "he's trying to act white".

How many people who are classified as being members of a given ethnic group is enough to make their habits, attitudes, and behaviors a characteristic of their ethnicity? When a white radio commentator decides to refer to some athletes as "hos" merely because they are women, is the commentator acting in accordance with the demands of whiteness, violating the rules of whiteness, or neither?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. So you support the cultural practice
of female genital mutilation or cannibalism or subjugation of women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
45. Where does that statement come from?
You also lost me with that remark. I can only guess at what the argument is that you are trying to advance.

It sounds a lot like you are trying to make the point that a person must necessarily either support the sexual abuse of little boys or else they must adopt some kind of anti-catholic bigotry. Do you think that this kind of argument explains something about social intolerance, and that somehow it makes it distictly different from racism? It's difficult to tell exactly what your reasoning is behind this accusation.

In any event, I don't think that way, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Yes, you missed my point
What I am trying to point out is that we need to be rational and pragmatic when looking at other cultures. I am all for a good spirit of multiculturalism to open ourselves up to new experiences and people, attempting to come to some understanding and common ground so that we can grow and be better people as well as dealing with our own bias and prejudice.

What I have seen alot of liberals believe is that if you have a criticism of a culture, you are racist, anti-semetic, anti-islamic etc and I think that is ridiculous. Cultures, like people, are not perfect and have negative aspects as well as positive ones.

I used female genital mutilation as an example of an extreme cultural practice that any reasonable person can see as barbaric. Do I "understand" why some groups practice it? yes, I do. That said, I believe that the ritual is based in irrational premises about religion and women and is subject to criticism.

Multi-culturalism has evolved, wrongly I think, from a spirit of seeking commonality to becoming some ridiculous belief that all cultures are equal and fair and off limits from critique. That couldn't be farther from the truth.

We only need to look at our own consumeristic culture to know that is not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
49. Is an american indian who protests against illegal immigration, racist?
Seems to me that you can't be racist against your own ethnicity.

Besides "Mexican" isn't a race any more than "American" is.

Xenophobia
Racism
Cultural intolerance

All different things, but we tend to use "racism" as shorthand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. Because people will find every reason to feel superior to others
including believing that embracing a acceptance of multiculturalism without a balance of rationality.

There are plenty of practices of other cultures that I find abhorent. Female genital mutilation comes to mind. I think it is barbaric. I understand the reasons but I just don't agree with them.

This is often the liberal achilles heel. We want to be open to all cultures and that on its face is a good thing. If we can overcome our own prejudices and work towards understanding other groups of people, I see no wrong in that. What I do think happens is that this idea of openness gets translated as blind acceptance and support and that is where problems occur.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
39. Thank you for making the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
48. Because "cultural intolerance" is a weasel phrase. Racism is racism, no matter now
much anyone wants to sugarcoat it.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. No doubt racism is racism. R is R, as the randroids might say.
The question is then: what ideological territory is the jurisdiction of racism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
51. This refers to something, right? Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. It doesn't refer to any one big thing in particular that I can think of.
However, the complete thread indicates that the "Nobody..." option is wrong (unless some people are role playing). Thus, the thread has itself elicited or evoked an example of what the thread refers to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Here: you don't need to read through this whole thread...
Edited on Thu Feb-28-08 11:58 PM by Boojatta
DuStrange referred to "the practice of holding a girl down and slicing off part of her clitoris" (admitting an "intolerance" of it, perhaps influenced by my use of the word "intolerant") and bryant69 proposed Japanese whaling as a possible example.

I trust that you, like DuStrange and bryant69, have enough general knowledge or research ability to identify some other possible examples of practices that one could be intolerant of. Whether or not one can be intolerant of those or other practices while neither accepting nor practicing racism is the question for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
56. Racism is like porn.. you know it when you see it/hear it....
You don't have to call it by a "special name" ..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC