Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contractor Tied To Cunningham Bribery Scandal In Charge Of WH "Missing" E-Mails.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:44 PM
Original message
Contractor Tied To Cunningham Bribery Scandal In Charge Of WH "Missing" E-Mails.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 06:14 PM by kpete
Remember MZM, the government body shop whose founder and CEO Mitchell Wade was charged as a co-conspirator in the Duke Cunningham bribery scandal? Well, MZM is among the handful of contractors identified in writing by a White House technology official at a Waxman hearing today as having been hired to deal with White House email - millions of which have gone missing. See page 4/question 5 of this questionnaire (.pdf) http://oversight.house.gov/documents/20080226143915.pdf filled out by Mr. Steve McDevitt, a senior manager in office of the chief information office of the Executive Office of the President administration office from 2002 through 2006.

http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/007067.html

more:

User Accountability - The approach of simply storing email message in .pst files provides no mechanism or audit trail that tracks changes to data files or the activities performed by users or system administrators.

According to Mr. McDevitt, he brought his concerns to the attention of senior officials at the White House, including “White House Counsel Harriet Miers and members of her staff.”

http://citizensforethics.org/files/Committee%20Report%20on%20WH%20Email.pdf

more:

I keep tripping over more and more goodies with each paragraph I read:

The documents received by the Committee show that the White House was repeatedly warned that its system for preserving e-mails was inadequate…

These risks were reiterated in an internal White House “discussion document” from October 2005. According to this document:

There is operational risk in current email storage management processes. Lost or misplaced email archives may result in an inability to meet statutory requirements…Standard operating procedures for email management do not exist. Automated tools that support the email archive process are not robust. The current version…is prone to failure…Searches of email in response to statutory requirements may not be complete, creating legal and political risk.

http://citizensforethics.org/files/Committee%20Report%20on%20WH%20Email.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. And they dealt with it precisely as ordered.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 05:58 PM by aquart
I wonder what they would reveal with a bit of waterboarding? Could we set it up in some congressional anteroom? Tape it, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That is a really good idea! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. creating legal and political risk.
Yep I'm sure they are quaking in their boots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4.  “the aspens are all connected at their roots"
Nice post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC