Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul Craig Roberts A Bi-Partisan Attack on the Constitution: The Mukasey Conspiracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:02 AM
Original message
Paul Craig Roberts A Bi-Partisan Attack on the Constitution: The Mukasey Conspiracy
The Mukasey Conspiracy

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
March 3, 2008


Having made the mistake of confirming Michael Mukasey as US Attorney General, the Democrats again find their efforts to hold Republican government officials accountable for illegal and unethical behavior stonewalled by the Department of Justice (sic) and blocked by the brownshirt tactics for which the Bush Regime is now infamous. ..... Mukasey gave House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the majority Democrats in Congress the finger and refused to refer the House of Representatives charges against the two Bush Regime operatives to a federal grand jury for investigation. Following the now established practice by the Bush Regime, Mukasey told the Speaker of the House that members of the executive branch are above the law and are not accountable to the US Congress, formerly a co-equal branch of government under the US Constitution in the days now past when the executive branch felt obliged to abide by the Constitution.

ukasey boldly asserted in his letter to Congress that Miers and Bolton are immune from congressional subpoenas and, thereby, their "noncompliance did not constitute a crime."

.....

Pelosi herself was instrumental in making the executive branch unaccountable to Congress or to law when she declared impeachment of Bush to be "off the table." This declaration by the Speaker of the House has effectively released the Bush Regime from any accountability, just as the Enabling Act released Hitler from any accountability to the Reichstag, the German constitution, or statutory law.
Moreover, the case for impeaching Bush and Cheney--indeed the entire administration--is by far the most powerful and necessary case for impeachment that has ever existed. By declaring Bush unimpeachable, Pelosi is giving away Congress' only remaining power to prevent tyrannical rule by the executive branch. If Bush is above impeachment, every future president will be as well.

The Democrats naively believe that just one more year and the Bush Regime horror will be gone. But that is not the case. No matter who is the next president, the Bush Regime has established that the executive branch is no longer a co-equal branch of government. It is the primary branch, armed with unaccountability and the discretion to consult with other branches of government if it so wishes. The US Congress cannot give up the powers it has given up during the Bush years and ever expect to get them back.

.....

If a Regime that has come to be despised and deplored by a majority of Americans and the world can ride roughshod over law and the Constitution, constitutional government obviously has no future in America.
Pelosi says the House of Representatives is going to file a civil suit against the Bush administration for refusing to help it enforce its subpoenas. Who does Pelosi think is going to prosecute the suit, the politicized Republican US Attorneys? The Republican federal judges who have helped to create the unaccountable executive?

.....

The only power the House has left is impeachment, and Pelosi is too frightened to use it. Why is the Speaker of the House afraid to use the power the Constitution gives her to remove from office a president who deceived Congress and the American people, who violated US and international law, and who is a clear and present danger to American liberty, to the US Constitution, and to peace and stability in the world?





This one indefensible and sickening fact remains.


Nancy Pelosi has given away the only power that We The People have to hold this malignant executive accountable.

History will not be kind to her contribution to the loss of the United States Constitution.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. ALL of congress is LIABLE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think history will forget her in the end. How many house speakers are remembered like presidents?
George W. Bush will be known for far longer than Pelosi ever will be. Perhaps the only consolation in that is the fact that Bush will likely be remembered as one of the most unpopular presidents in American history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. First female speaker. She will long be remembered as having set back women
in politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. k&r (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. "when she declared impeachment of Bush to be "off the table.""
If there were ever a time for a Dem to live up to the label "flip-flopper." And no, history won't judge Nancy kindly... unless her intent is to prosecute the whole diseased bunch to the full extent of the law in U.S. courts after the inauguration, then off to the Hague for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Everyone will be pardoned for everything at the end of the term. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is the most important political issue this country faces. Not the primaries. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're right, but the path to resolution lies in Telecom Immunity - that will expose them
The only chance we now have, after Pelosi's foolish statement, is to be had in the civil suits against the telecommunications compaines for the warnatless spying on all communications from every American. This is our window of opportunity, our only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. There are so many scandals, picking a path is a dilemna, so follow them all
I say, and do not bet on one track only.

We need to refresh our memory once in a while. This SCANDAL LIST from last May:

Yesterday was a GREAT DAY for Falwell TO DIE. Or, the Buffalo Jump to Hell.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x899312

So, now we know to skip this step, DoJ enforcing contempt on request.

Onward, on EVERY FRONT! Don't be fooled by those saying we have only one issue and one lost hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Congress if they give him another green light on this
they should be held on treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Voter Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Pelosi not all bad
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 11:10 AM by I_Voter

Prior to the 2006 elections Pelosi managed to create the 100 Hours plan.


Apparently it worked. At any rate the Democrats did very well in 2006. I liked many things about it like Raising the minimum wage to $7.25 an hour. Cutting the interest rate on student loans in half. Allowing the government to negotiate directly with the pharmaceutical companies for lower drug prices for Medicare patients.

I am not an expert in U.S. politics, but here are some things
to think about. -


How could any Democratic political leader know that President Bush wouldn't veto these measures? How could Nancy Pelosi know that a minority of U.S. Senators wouldn't filibuster them, or for that matter have a handful of Senators put an indefinite hold on the bills using Senate privilege? Since U.S. Senators have weak party discipline there would also be some question of Senate Democratic unity on the issue. The U.S. House would be more certain because party discipline is stronger.

Now I am going to make a wild assumption.


I think Nancy Pelosi needed to make some deals. I don't actually know if deals were made, and if any deals were made I don't know what they were. However: deals are the way almost anything gets done in politics. This is particularly true given the way the U.S. Senate has chosen to structure itself.

Jack

Political Power in the U.S.

(And why you haven't got any.)

http://tinyurl.com/2sdtvk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. she did not live up to the billing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Empress
It is hard to accept a "maxim" that you must only support the Democratic candidate when the Democratic candidate does not represent the Democrats themselves. The people. That is going to be the problem with Hillary Clinton if she becomes the nominee. Why support a Democrat when they do not support the Democrats themselves? Sorry but a growing number of people in both parties simply will not continue to support the party candidate. And Nancy Pelosi is yet another example of why they won't.

Nancy Pelosi is representative of what we have in Congress. Republicrats. They are destroying this country. Sitting and listening to Nero play his fiddle while Rome burns to the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh...
And f__k Feinstein as well. Her and her "nice" comments about Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yep, we have some work ahead of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. boy, did you just say a mouthful! that's why loyalty oaths are bullshit!
<<It is hard to accept a "maxim" that you must only support the Democratic candidate when the Democratic candidate does not represent the Democrats themselves. The people. >>

why indeed! and while you say it will only be Hillary's problem, I say it will be both Obama & Hillary's problem. you have no right to expect my loyalty when you have shown NONE yourself. the nominee can kiss my ass!

Pelosi should be removed from office, as should any dem who does not support democratic ideals, as should any dem who reaches across that fucking aisle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. Disgusting But Necessary for Others to Realize
that we are not only up against the GOP or Bush, but against traitors in our own political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Voter Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Do you think that U.S. Political Parties are Exceptional?
fascisthunter wrote:

Disgusting But Necessary for Others to Realize that we are not only up against the GOP or Bush, but against traitors in our own political party.

----

Dude - Political parties were effectively outlawed starting around the 1890's. I am using the term political party as it was understood prior to the 1890's, and as it is still understood in most if not all of the worlds democracies. It's another one of them examples of "American Exceptional-ism" That's a technical term meaning "the U.S. is an Empire." All we have today, for all intents and purposes, are political labels. (see below)

Can You Define What a Political Party is?


I also voted for Dennis Kucinich for President - for the second time now! He is one of the few Democratic candidates that are also democrats. It's true that Sen. Obama was the lead sponsor of legislation to implement IRV for certain Illinois elections, but he has nothing on his web site.

Jack

Quote from 1927

Here in the last generation, a development has taken place which finds an analogy nowhere else. American parties have ceased to be voluntary associations like trade unions or the good government clubs or the churches. They have lost the right freely to determine how candidates shall be nominated and platforms framed, even who shall belong to the party and who shall lead it. The state legislatures have regulated their structure and functions in great detail.

SOURCE:
American Parties and Elections,
by Edward Sait, 1927 (Page 174)
Quoted from:
The tyranny of the two-party system,
by Lisa Jane Disch c2002






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. 'off the table'=Free Pass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hear, hear!
I pray the Speaker will hear this too.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. The DoJ is defying the Constitution, the AG flat out admits it.
Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Michael Mukasey profile from Source Watch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. Didn't Schumer and Feinstein cross the aisle to vote with the GOP to confirm Mukasey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Oh, yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. "Mukasey's Paradox" by Jonathan Turley (LATimes via CommonDreams 3-4-2008)
"When You think about it, his manipulations are a beautiful, twisted thing."
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/03/04/7449/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC