Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Madness By Howard Zinn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:12 PM
Original message
Election Madness By Howard Zinn
http://www.progressive.org/mag_zinn0308

Election Madness
By Howard Zinn, March 2008 Issue

<snip>
The subhead was “7,563 homes were seized, nearly 3 times the ’06 rate.”

A few nights before, CBS television reported that 750,000 people with disabilities have been waiting for years for their Social Security benefits because the system is underfunded and there are not enough personnel to handle all the requests, even desperate ones.
Stories like these may be reported in the media, but they are gone in a flash. What’s not gone, what occupies the press day after day, impossible to ignore, is the election frenzy.
<snip>

No, I’m not taking some ultra-left position that elections are totally insignificant, and that we should refuse to vote to preserve our moral purity. Yes, there are candidates who are somewhat better than others, and at certain times of national crisis (the Thirties, for instance, or right now) where even a slight difference between the two parties may be a matter of life and death.
I’m talking about a sense of proportion that gets lost in the election madness. Would I support one candidate against another? Yes, for two minutes—the amount of time it takes to pull the lever down in the voting booth.

But before and after those two minutes, our time, our energy, should be spent in educating, agitating, organizing our fellow citizens in the workplace, in the neighborhood, in the schools. Our objective should be to build, painstakingly, patiently but energetically, a movement that, when it reaches a certain critical mass, would shake whoever is in the White House, in Congress, into changing national policy on matters of war and social justice.

Let’s remember that even when there is a “better” candidate (yes, better Roosevelt than Hoover, better anyone than George Bush), that difference will not mean anything unless the power of the people asserts itself in ways that the occupant of the White House will find it dangerous to ignore.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. And more
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is no shortage of BAD NEWS. Hope is in short supply. gooooObama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Howard Zinn rocks
"There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people." Howard Zinn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. great quote! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. it's what makes this election..
so different. The possibility that we might actually be able to figure out a way to have people get together, and work to cure our social ills. Kind of like the Renaissance. Or the Impossible Dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent article. I wish everyone could read it.
He speaks the truth. I particularly like these two comments:

<we have all been brought up to believe that voting is crucial in determining our destiny, that the most important act a citizen can engage in is to go to the polls and choose one of the two mediocrities who have already been chosen for us.>

to repeat, "choose one of the two mediocrities who have already been chosen for us." In that sentence, he sums up what I've been arguing for a while, but much more eloquently and succinctly than I was able to muster.

And his closing sentence: "Voting is easy and marginally useful, but it is a poor substitute for democracy, which requires direct action by concerned citizens."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. direct action by concerned citizens.
without this, there is no Democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. ==
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC