ensho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:48 AM
Original message |
for those who can't read buzzflash anymore |
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Isss that because buzzflash is "dead" for some folks?? |
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
2. What's wrong with Buzzflash? |
Kittycat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Just another RW Website |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-08-08 10:54 AM by Kittycat
At least according to the "everyone is against me" HillFans. :rofl:
|
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. It has become a one-sided GD-P |
|
:shrug: I hope there is no buyers remorse as there was with Peloisi..Dig deep and ignore the sound bites..
|
usrbs
(583 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Thanks. I cancelled my Buzzflash subscription last week. n/t |
acmavm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
4. COOL! That's where I got this little gem: |
|
Obama Adviser: I ‘Strongly’ Believe Telecoms ‘Should Be Granted Immunity’
One of Obama’s advisers on intelligence and foreign policy advisers, however, is someone who “strongly” supports telecomm immunity. John Brennan is a former CIA official and the current chairman of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance. In a new National Journal interview, Brennan makes it clear that he agrees with the Bush administration on the issue of immunity:
There is this great debate over whether or not the telecom companies should in fact be given immunity for their agreement to provide support and cooperate with the government after 9/11. I do believe strongly that they should be granted that immunity, because they were told to do so by the appropriate authorities that were operating in a legal context, and so I think that’s important. And I know people are concerned about that, but I do believe that’s the right thing to do. I do believe the Senate version of the FISA bill addresses the issues appropriately.
These corporations may not have been acting within law, which is why many of them are now pushing for immunity. They chose to break the law and profited greatly from doing so. (At least one company refused to comply with the Bush administration’s request because it knew the actions were illegal.)
|
Beregond2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message |
|
People are abandoning Buzzflash because they are daring to tell the truth about Hillary.
|
ensho
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-08-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. baloney - that's not why |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message |