Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: CIA Leak Jury Enters 5th Day of Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:43 AM
Original message
AP: CIA Leak Jury Enters 5th Day of Debate
02-27
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/02/27/national/w062109S91.DTL&type=politics

After the judge dismissed one of its members, the jury finished a fourth day of deliberations Monday without a verdict in the perjury trial of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

Most of the morning was consumed by deciding what to do about an art historian on the jury who saw or read something over the weekend about the trial. After interviewing her in private along with lawyers in the case, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton ruled that "what she had exposure to obviously disqualifies her."

The judge let the jurors continue deliberating with just 11 members after the defense endorsed that option. He overruled prosecutors who asked him to seat one of two alternate jurors who heard the trial and remain on standby.

Walton said he didn't want to "throw away two and a half days" of discussions the jury has had since getting the case at midday last Wednesday. If an alternate had been seated, the jury would have been required to begin its deliberations over from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is not smelling good to me
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why? ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hung Jury n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. how so? There is a lot of information to look over and 2 charges
they should take their time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Sure looks like they are hung
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think it is a good sign that they are still working...HOWEVER
I am still trying to figure out about the dismissed juror from yesterday. My friend may a comment yesterday that has me wondering: Could she have been a plant that was design to just gather infomation. And if two counts had been decided one way or another she was to get out and give Bushco the info so they could plan accordingly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think she just wanted to no longer be on the jury...
I am not lawyer; but my guess is that the - hung jury - is doing a lot of paper shuffling, and going thru meaningless motions, so as to appear to be busy - so out of frustration the juror "accidentally" read a newspaper to get off of jury duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC