enid602
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 04:00 PM
Original message |
Hill as PNAC? Hill as McCarthy? |
|
Is the other side trying to turn Hillary into the 'bogey-woman?'
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Hillary is DLC .....DLC founded by PNAC member |
|
Hillary is a leading member of the DLC.
Hillary by association (and her IWR vote) then supports the PNAC agenda.
It aint rocket surgery.
|
enid602
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I guess all the other congressional members that voted for the IWR are PNAC too; they must be a pretty big club, indeed! And I guess that makes Obama non-PNAC, because he voted against the IWR. Oh wait, he never voted on it.
|
pokercat999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. It makes them cowards. Afraid to do the right thing in the |
|
face of losing re-election. Cowards one and all. They should all be driven out of the party during their next primary. Although, thinking about it; it is kinda kewl being in a party without principles.
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. it "ain't" proper logic either - there is no proven cause/effect relationship unless |
|
you believe obama's repeated votes to support and fund the slaughter of iraqis also supports the PNAC agenda.
Msongs
|
enid602
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
And yet, we're all being told to fear the 'bogey-woman.' Who's afraid of the great big 'bogey-woman?'
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 09:14 AM
Response to Original message |