Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientist: Ben Stein's 'Expelled' should really be 'Flunked Out'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:45 AM
Original message
Scientist: Ben Stein's 'Expelled' should really be 'Flunked Out'
Comedian and former Nixon speechwriter Ben Stein's new documentary, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, will not open until this Friday, but it has already been widely blasted for its alleged dishonesty and looseness with the facts.

Stein has recently emerged as a prominent spokesperson for so-called "intelligent design," a pseudo-scientific gloss over the religious philosophy of creationism. Using film-making techniques clearly borrowed from Michael Moore, Stein set out to confront scientists and educators about their alleged persecution of supporters of intelligent design, whom Stein claims have been "targeted for retaliation and harassment."

However, the National Center for Science Education has performed an extensive investigation of the "martyrs" profiled in Stein's file and has found a consistent pattern of misrepresentation.

"We reviewed public records and reports on the intelligent design promoters who were supposedly discriminated against, and we discovered that the claims that they lost their jobs over intelligent design are unsupported," biologist Josh Rosenau explained. "That said, professors who aren't making advances in their field, editors who disregard their journal's established practices, and lecturers who repeat creationist falsehoods shouldn't be surprised if they have trouble holding jobs. These people weren't expelled; they flunked out."

<snip>

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Comedian_Ben_Stein_pushed_intelligent_design_0416.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Knowing how stupid this awful country is
the film will probably be a big hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Stein - a republicon propagandist telling lies
As usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can I ask a sensitive religious question?
O.K. I know that mostly evangelical christians are proponents of intelligent design and forcing it's teaching in school and against evolution and all of that.

But what is the position of the jewish religion on this subject. Because honestly I was under the impression that Ben Stein was Jewish. So is his attachment to this subject religious or just based off of reflexively attaching himself to a "conservative" position just for spite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. I'm guessing the only religious angle of it
is when they keep saying that evolution is why the Nazis killed so many Jews, so they picked Stein as the spokesmodel.



I did not make that image - but a friend of mine commented: "Wow. Angus Young has not aged well!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. What sort of scrutiny will Stein be subjected to?
Remember how the wingnuts went over Fahrenheith 911 practically frame by frame, desperately searching for anything they could use? Remember how the Right Wing Echo Chamber told and re-told and re-told again (amplifying every time) every alleged discrepancy? I wonder if any factual digressions in Stein's documentary will receive similar treatment?

What am I saying? Of course not.

On the other hand, this train wreck of a mockumentary looks so horrible (based on the snippet of an ad I saw, so I'm as qualified as anyone else you'll see getting paid millions to comment) that it will not even register on the national consciousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. The National Center for Science Education and Scientific American both screened it ...
Here's the Scientific American review. The producers were hoping for credibility. They didn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah, but they don't get into the mainstream media
This is why we need more people like Carl Sagan around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Nah, they were hoping to get crapped on.
Please. the creators know they're duping idiotic Americans who actually think biologists call themselves "Darwinists".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. If it does as poorly at the box office as I suspect
Edited on Thu Apr-17-08 08:08 AM by rpannier
They'll pay little attention.

But Ben should take heart...In 30-50 years it may join the likes of Reefer Madness and Plan 9 From Outer Space as a cult classic

edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkturian Clone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. I say just let this movie release and die.
The more people complain about it, the more well-known it will become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. agreed
scientists get tired having to slap these same old shitty arguments down when they can be working on real research
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. whoever designed Ben Stein clearly wasn't intelligent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. He does not exist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Oh, How I Wish You Were Right
But, alas, there he is using up perfectly good oxygen.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Where is he?
He not right here in this room. How do I know he isn't just like the Piltdown Man. Constructed to fool me. Micheal Creighton pointed out if they can make computer Dinosaurs they can make computer Ben Steins. They can make computers do anything. Even use oxygen! Don't be fooled my friend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. A Very Funny Point (eom)
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Don't compare his style to Michael Moore - not even close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. It looks pretty damned pathetic to me.
Part of me almost wants it to do well enough to stay out in release long enough for lots of rational people to make lots of fun of it.

If it does as poorly as I imagine it will, it's just another write-off for whichever thug financed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. I almost want to go see this train wreck, but I can't justify giving that cretin my money.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-17-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. this "movie" has Razzie written all over it
the most pathetic attempt at making fundy creationist propaganda. I'm sure it will get screening inside the creationist museum it ranked right up there with it's unique brand of fantasy fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC