Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How can a cop be acquited when he empties his pistol into an unarmed man

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:29 PM
Original message
How can a cop be acquited when he empties his pistol into an unarmed man
reloads and keeps shooting? WTF is wrong w/ the judge? He needs to be impeached.

original-nyc.indymedia

Three Cops Acquitted In Killing of Sean Bell

At Queens courthouse, judge presiding over the Sean Bell trial acquitted NYPD officers of all counts

By NYC IMC

NEW YORK - Three detectives were acquitted of all charges Friday in the 50-shot killing of an unarmed groom-to-be on his wedding day, a case that put the NYPD at the center of another dispute involving allegations of excessive firepower.

~snip~
.
.
.
complete article here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Supposedly the car they were driving was attempting to run an officer down
and there had been talk of getting in the car to get his gun following an argument in the bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is an example of the "God damn America!" that Rev. Wright was speaking of. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. The law is what they say it is
welcome to the new reality. Good luck surviving it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. *It was an accident.*


"Yeah. That's the ticket."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's only indeed a mystery to racism-deniers. Fucking cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. which ones were black, and which ones were white?
that might give you your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Two of the cops are, in fact, black.
So, basically, their training tells them to treat all members of their own race, particularly young males, as criminals until proven otherwise. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Basically their training does just that ~
And many AA that become police are people that believe that "you must follow the rules" of the setting.
Thus ~ they aren't trained to look at race,they are trained to "protect and to serve the establishment."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. The judge decided
based on the evidence presented. It may be a case of incompetent prosecutors. Not a whole lot different than the O.J. case.

Let's face it-it wouldn't be a stretch to say that the best of the law school graduates don't generally wind up working as prosecutors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe he shot one of those super-lucky black men we keep hearing about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Yep. He was probably going to steal the presidency from a more deserving white woman someday. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. We are already gone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because judges and prosecutors will be on the cop's side.
More often than not. With a jury, they probably would have been convicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because he can? Who the hell knows! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. This really disgusted me - I hope there are other avenues of
recourse for the victim's family and family "to have been". I agreed with Sharpton for once - "this wasn't a miscarriage of justice, it was an abortion".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. I was outraged by the verdict.
:mad: We all should be. There's no one one has to take 50 shots..either the cop is a horrible shooter or he really wanted to kill this man. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pineywoods Sam Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. I heard of this for the first time today.

And I don't know any details. But for one man to shoot at another 31 times -- seems excessive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. A lot of jurors are just really unwilling to convict a cop, no matter what.
It's a big problem for defense attorneys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No jury in this case.
If it is a problem it is a problem for prosecutors not defense attorneys. The cops were on trial - remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm sorry, it takes me about 1/2 of an hour at the range
to shoot 50 rounds. If nobody is shooting back at you, and as I understand it, no one was, what possible excuse could you have for discharging 50 rounds of ammunition? I happen to love my guns and support our right to keep and bear arms but something about this incident just stinks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The car was coming at them.
The groom had said he was going to get his gun in the car. So you take your half hour as the car flies into you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. The cops never heard the gun comment, and witness testimony disputes
that the groom and his pals ever tried to run down the pigs (who hadn't identified themselves as cops) until after the shooting started, and they stationed themselves in front of the car. Maybe if once every decade or so NY's finest unloaded thirty, forty, fifty rounds in an innocent unarmed white Wall St. trader or lawyer or something then i wouldn't be so sure it's an institutional systemic racism. But seeing as how that's never happenened, I'm fairly confident in stating that if these guys had been white they'd be alive an the fact the judge let'em walk is a travesty of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stirlingsliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. Racism
Sadly, racism is still rampant in our country.

The judge's verdict in this case merely confirms that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC