|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 05:56 PM Original message |
House passes bill that will let the RIAA take away your home for downloading music |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wow is right. Rec'd for more eyes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
2. More here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
4. Priorities and all that jazz! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. Conyers sponsored it, too. Roll call of shame inside. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Asgaya Dihi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Same thing I noticed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbgrunt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. a truly shamful vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
32. David Wu voted for it- but then again there NO ISSUE or constituent he wouldn't sell out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
34. It was a ridiculous 410-11 vote. Six were (R) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Yay, Boucher! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. With CURRENT laws, $4.5 billion in potential damages per year - for ONE person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. Another step toward complete CorporateFascism. GRRRecommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. Evidetly abetted by our House of Representatives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
and-justice-for-all (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. RIAA are thugs.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Congress keeps giving these thugs weapons with which to beat people down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
10. dirty bastards n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeNearMcChord (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
12. There are those who are disgusted by asste forfieture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hart2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. asset forfieture is not based on the common law, but admiralty law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hidey (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. Thank goodness.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Nicely put! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
15. Fucking assholes. They can go to hell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superkia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
17. I think this has more to do with cutting off peoples ways of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Historical note.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NuttyFluffers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 04:20 AM Response to Original message |
18. Et tu, Barbara Lee? then fall my future new record purchases... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
19. It's estimated that this Bill would cost the taxpayers $435 million over the 2009-2013 period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hart2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
21. K & R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
23. K & R... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
24. Boycott the RIAA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbgrunt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
25. What are they thinking? Oh, I guess they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fountain79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
27. Not to say that I agree with the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Download music? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
divineorder (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Even if you think downloading music should be punished |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. They already CAN and DO. This bill will just make the penalties worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Also, did you read this part of the OP: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smith_3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
33. Well, theoretically this bill is useless, since means of anonymous file transfer exist. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
36. Time to encrypt our hard drives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
37. Amazing stories of RIAA's already mafia-like tactics, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
38. Kick in case some weekday people haven't seen this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
39. What a great business plan...attack your very best potential customers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC