Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi: "B*sh Comments Benath Dignity of Office"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:56 AM
Original message
Pelosi: "B*sh Comments Benath Dignity of Office"
http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0508/Pelosi_strongly_condemns_Bush_speech.html

Democratic Housel leaders are calling out President Bush for a speech in Israel in which he seemed to suggest that Sen. Barack Obama wants the United States to "negotiate with terrorists."

<snip>

Referring to Sen. John McCain, Pelosi said: "I would hope that any serious person that aspires to lead the country, would disassociate themselves from those comments.”

As Pelosi was speaking, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel issued a statement in which he said: "The tradition has always been that when a U.S. president is overseas, partisan politics stops at the water's edge. President Bush has now taken that principle and turned it on its head: for this White House, partisan politics now begins at the water’s edge, no matter the seriousness and gravity of the occasion. Does the president have no shame?”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. to answer rahm, no this idiot of a fucking president has NO SHAME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. LOL and
Edited on Thu May-15-08 11:05 AM by malaise
ditto.

I hope KO is typing his Special Commentary for tonight.
add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Does the president have no shame?"
Edited on Thu May-15-08 11:01 AM by Bob3
Nope - not an ounce of shame anywhere in his body - look at the golf nonsense. anyone with a working sense of shame would have torn their own head off rather than say something that inane.

any other questions you need help on Rahm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nice reference to Joseph Welch's cutting rebuttal to Joseph McCarthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. You know what's beneath the dignity of his office? Having a war criminal in it.
You know what's beneath the dignity of Nancy Pelosi's office?

Taking impeachment off the table.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Damn straight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ding Ding
etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. great reply - wish I could recommend it
and, the freepers will get upset at Pelosi and say that getting a blowjob in office was beneath the dignity of the president as well - because, of course, no other president ever had an affair while in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I'd say the blowjob was pretty much an unspoken perk of being President.
However, the cigar thing...

We really need to only elect non-smoking presidents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. You got that right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Yep yep yep. She's a fucking big reason we're still having to
be embarrassed and shamed by this fuckwit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Then impeach him already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nancy and Rohm, with all due respect...
had you done your fucking jobs, this war criminal idiot of a president would have already been impeached and removed from office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Amen. This is what happens when a radical lunatic is left in power.
Edited on Thu May-15-08 11:12 AM by npincus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. How?
Which republican senators would vote to remove him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Look, the House had enough evidence to start impeachment HEARINGS
...in 74 that was enough for Nixon to resign cuz he didn't want all that stuff coming out in Congress. The HEARINGS were well within House power and I thought Conyers would be the first one to jump on it. You wouldn't have needed Repig senators at that point.

Gawd knows what deal Pelosi made with the devil--but I for one will never forgive her for it. I can't vote for her, I'm in the southern part of SF, and we have a GREAT new rep in Jackie Speier. But you better believe Pelosi's SF constituents are bitterly disappointed and will show it in the voting booths!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. And Nixon would've been removed.
Nobody has ever shown me any evidence whatsoever that makes me think there are 17 Republicans who would vote to remove Bush.

Just saying it or wishing for it doesn't make it true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. The ones who want to get re-elected. The country would have
screamed for Bush's head once all the evidence was aired for all to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. She could have impeach the criminal
But it was off the table
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Well, better late than never
FINALLY some solidarity among Dem officeholders!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. I love it when she fights the good fight (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Democrats are in Unison -- they must have known this was coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
20. She can talk the talk, but refuses to walk the walk, cf her stand on impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. bush is a shame but he has no shame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
25. Hey Nancy, if you had been doing your job worth a damn, the POS wouldn't BE in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
26. Nancy, where have you been for the last 7+ years?
It's not just bu$h's comments that are beneath the dignity of the office!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. Seriously? snort....
To speak in terms of Bush as simply a bad president who made a partisan remark denies the reality of what Bush is...and what Bush is is a war criminal, whose criminal actions have endangered the country.

Using language that in any way denies that fact is beneath contempt....

Asking if Bush has no shame is laughable. The man implemented a torture policy and brags about it....the use of language that denies this does a disservice to the truth by framing the situation as Bush being partisan and taking cheap shots when the problem is ever so much bigger...ever so much worse...ever so much dangerous.

Course, it all began the day Bush was treated as a legitimate president...someone who could be judged by the expectations of what a president should be....and that delusion continues still











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
28. Oh shut the hell up and impeach him already!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC