Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boy, that didn't take long! "Gay marriage back as campaign issue"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:52 PM
Original message
Boy, that didn't take long! "Gay marriage back as campaign issue"
#^%$&%!! AP! :grr:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/gay_marriage_politics

McCain rejected the will of the state's high court even as he tried to maintain his long-held stance that the issue should be left to the states. He suggested that he backs an effort by California's religious conservatives to put a constitutional amendment defining marriage as solely between a man and a woman on the November ballot.

The Arizona senator opposes gay marriage but, in a break with the GOP's right flank, he also opposes a federal constitutional amendment banning same-sex unions on grounds that states traditionally have decided the issue. McCain did work to ban gay marriage in Arizona, campaigning for a ballot measure there in 2006. The measure failed.

This year, there are indications that the GOP's conservative base is not nearly as energized as the Democrats' liberal base. If true, a California ballot initiative — and others in Arizona and Florida — could help mobilize dispirited conservatives to turn out in the fall there and elsewhere, and, perhaps, boost McCain's prospects.


All this spin is making me dizzy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Amazing, isn't it? Although we shouldn't be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. The big wedge issue that keeps on giving
Frankly, I don't think anything will energize the GOP this year, not even the old favorites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. get yer donnie mcclurkin CDs with that old time religion (the one that used ta enslave blacks) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. God guns and gays...McSame is just a one trick pony like the rest of the repukes.
Edited on Thu May-15-08 08:57 PM by tjwash
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a sure fact that McCain would love to see a gay marriage . . .
ban on the CA ballot, in some desperate attempt to flog up enthusiasm for his campaign.

I'm all for it too: it'd mean McCain would in all likelihood spend lots more time and money in CA (a state he will certainly lose) in the vain hope that the issue's coattails would do him some good.

Bring it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. You're absolutely correct. McCain would lighting the 'exploding cigar' of campaign killers by


hitching his wagon to movement to over turn settled
state law by yet another proposal to turn exclusive hetero
marriage into the eleventh commandment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't be fooled. It never went away.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Isn't that pretty much all three candidates' view
Hillary is against gay marriage altogether, and both McCain and Obama think the states should decide.

Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Is she?
Hillary is against gay marriage altogether

From the article:

Clinton's campaign said she "believes that gay and lesbian couples in committed relationships should have the same rights and responsibilities as all Americans and believes that civil unions are the best way to achieve this goal. As president, Hillary Clinton will work to ensure same-sex couples have access to these rights and responsibilities at the federal level. She has said and continues to believe that the issue of marriage should be left to the states."

Sounds pretty close to Obama's position to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Close, but Obama hasn't restricted himself to civil unions
Hillary doesn't believe the answer lies in marriage equality. Her solution is more of a "separate but equal" one. Maybe that is how the whole thing will play out in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. that is utterly false
Just today, yes today, he restricted himself to civil unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. that is utterly false
Just today, yes today, he restricted himself to civil unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I realize they waffle and change their minds, clarify--I was speaking about the relative present
Edited on Fri May-16-08 08:31 AM by marshall
I was talking about the present. I realize candidates can waffle, some more than others. I was just mulling over how Hillary might change her mind about civil unions in order to court the Oregon vote--but then she would alienate the Kentucky vote, which is her West Virginia style base. I think she will stick with her current (as far as I know it) standpoint.
So at this point as far as we know all three candidates have the same position.

Can you point us to the URL that gives Obama's pronouncement this month that clarifies his opinion making it different from what he said in October:

http://visiblevote08.logoonline.com/2007/10/30/obama-on-ellen-gay-unions-now/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. What are you talking about? Of course he's restricted himself to civil unions
and he uses his "religious beliefs" as his reason for opposing same sex marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. His stand is different than Hillary's
He said he is fighting for civil unions but he basically leaves marriage alone (which I would agree is less than what he could do). Hillary has also supported civil unions but she has said she does NOT support marriage equality. I realize it may not seem like much of a difference, and perhaps Obama is just playing the game better. He does after all have to court the traditional black churches that are (Rev Wright notwithstanding) against marriage equality. Perhaps Hillary is taking a more outwardly strident standpoint because she is scrambling for the West Virginia/Kentucky votes now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. False-
Obama opposes, on a personal religious basis, marriage equality. This is odd because his church and Rev Wright support equality. Obama has clearly stated that he thinks marriage is 'one man and one woman' just like a Republican, and in fact has said he agrees with Dick Cheney on the issue, he specifically said 'I agree with Dick Cheney'.
In addition of course, his campaign has been tainted by the open use of Evangelical anti-gay preachers who spread their message at Obama events.

Obama has said over and over again that he does not support marriage equality. For others that is. For himself and his parents of course. For others, he wants unequal treatment under the law, he says so, and no amount of Secret Spin Sauce is going to make that go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Obama is opposed to gay marriage:
"I'm a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman."

http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianactivism/p/BarackObama.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thanks for the citation!
It's always better than heresay.
Looks like California has an uphill battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes,
it worked the last two times...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. States Rights... vs the feds
Alabama can keep their laws against dildos
and sex toys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yeah?
That train has left the station...just their feeble attempt to cultivate seeds of hate to the ignorant.

Well....this time the Dems better take off the gloves and swing back....lots of ammunition available. They must preface every single time with " an example of another flag waving, christian conservative....and there are LOTS to pick from....


http://salem-news.com/articles/october172007/repub_scandals_10_17_07.php

http://dkosopedia.com/wiki/Republican_Sex_Scandals

http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/01/18/scandal/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC