|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 05:38 PM Original message |
Who do you suppose owns the copyright on the CURIOUS GEORGE image? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Somebody posted yesterday it was owned by the Disney Corporation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Well that would explain the non-action by the copyright holder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. It's owned by Houghton-Mifflin Publishers and they are very protective of the copyright and have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
2. The man in the yellow hat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. I thought that the publisher of the *Curious George* books owned the copyright. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. Check this out .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. What's the rule now? A hundred years, or fifty after the author dies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Even with their renewal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Ah, THERE it is, then!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. It's more recent than 1924. It's from 1941. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Houghton Mifflin Company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Which begs the question ... why have they not filed for the injunction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-16-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. They may be in the process--and I doubt they want to give the sick, racist fuck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC