Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stop the Oil Speculators - by Ralph Nader (seriously, it's interesting)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 03:17 PM
Original message
Stop the Oil Speculators - by Ralph Nader (seriously, it's interesting)
Edited on Tue May-27-08 03:19 PM by LucyParsons

Stop the Oil Speculators
by Ralph Nader
5/27/08

What factors are causing the zooming price of crude oil, gasoline and heating products? What is going to be done about it?

Don’t rely on the White House—with Bush and Cheney marinated in oil—or the Congress—which has hearings that grill oil executives who know that nothing is going to happen on Capitol Hill either.

Last week the price of crude oil reached about $130 a barrel after spiking to $140 briefly. The immediate cause? Guesses by oil man T. Boone Pickens and Goldman Sachs that the price could go to $150 and $200 a barrel respectivly in the near future. They were referring to what can be called the hoopla pricing party on the New York Mercantile Exchange. (NYMEX)

Meanwhile, consumers, workers and small businesses are suffering with the price of gasoline at $4 a gallon and diesel at $4.50 a gallon. Suffering but not protesting, except for a few demonstrations by independent truckers.

A consumer and small business revolt could be politically powerful. But what would they revolt to achieve? Their government is paralyzed and is unable to indicate any action if oil goes up to $200 or $400 a barrel. Washington, D.C. is leaving people defenseless and drawing no marker for when it will take action.

Oil was at $50 a barrel in January 2007, then $75 a barrel in August 2007. Now at $130 or so a barrel, it is clear that oil pricing is speculative activity, having very little to do with physical supply and demand. An essential product—petroleum—is set by speculators operating on rumor, greed, and fear of wild predictions.

Over the time since early 2007, U.S. demand for petroleum has fallen by 1 percent and world demand has risen by 1.3 percent. Supplies of crude are so plentiful, according to the Wall Street Journal, “traders of physical crude oil say their market is suffering from too much supply, not too little.”

Iran, for instance, is storing 25 million barrels of heavy, sour crude oil because, in the words of Hossein Kazempour Ardebili, Iran’s oil governor, “there are simply no buyers because the market has more than enough oil.”

Mike Wittner, head of oil research at Societe Generale in London agrees. “There’s various signals out there saying for right now, the markets are well supplied with crude.”

Historically, oil has been afflicted with the control of monopolists. From the late nineteenth century days of John D. Rockefeller, and his Standard Oil monopoly, to the emergence of the “Seven Sisters” oligopoly, made up of Standard Oil, Shell, BP, Texaco, Mobil, Gulf and Socal, to the rise of OPEC representing the major producing countries, the “free market” price of oil has been a mirage. Despite the breakup of the Standard Oil company by the government’s trustbusters about 100 years ago, selling cartels and buying oligopolies kept reasserting themselves.

In an ironic twist, the major price determinant has moved from OPEC (having only 40% of the world production) and the oil companies to the speculators in the commodities markets. What goes on in the essentially unregulated New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX)—without Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) enforced margin requirements, and, unlike your personal purchases, untaxed—is now the place that leads to your skyrocketing gasoline bills. OPEC and the Big Oil companies reap the benefits and say that it’s not their doing, but that of the speculators. Gives new meaning to “passing the buck.”

Deborah Fineman, president of Mitchell Supreme Fuel Co. in Orange, New Jersey, summed up the scene: “Energy markets have been dictated for too long by hedge funds and speculators, who artificially manipulate the numbers for their own benefit. The current market isn’t based on the sound principles of supply and demand but it is being rigged by companies and speculators who are jacking up prices for their own greed.”

Harry C. Johnson, former banker who worked for many years inside Big Oil and ran his own small oil company in Oklahoma, blames the CFTC, the Department of Energy, the Administration, and Congress, as “asleep at the switch on an issue that is probably costing U.S. consumers $1 billion per day.”

He cites “some industry experts, who profit greatly from the high price of crude, and have stated openly that the worldwide economic price of crude, absent speculators, would be around $50 to $60 per barrel.

Imagine, our government is letting your price for gasoline and home heating oil be determined by a gambling casino on Wall Street called NYMEX. The people need regulatory protection from speculators and an excess profits tax on Big Oil.

In addition, a sane government would see the present price crises as an opportunity to expand our passenger and freight railroad capacity and technology.

A sane government would drop all subsidies and tax loopholes for Big Oil’s huge profits and other fossil fuels and promote a national mission to solarize our economy to achieve major savings from energy conservation technology, retrofitting buildings, and upgrading efficiency standards for motor vehicles, home appliances, industrial engines and electric generating plants.

Those are the permanent ways to achieve energy independence, reduce our trade deficit, create good jobs that can’t be exported and protect the environmental health of people and nature.

Those are the reforms and advances that a muscular consumer, worker and small business revolt can focus on in the coming weeks.

What say you, America?

-END-



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. What can I say? He always nails the truth.
We have to convert the massive oil subsidies into massive alternative energy and conservation subsidies. That is the only way we will survive. We have to kick the Greedy Oil Party out of DC first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaDooRonRon Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't know about America, but I say:
1) Nader is correct - as usual

2) There is not a mainstream Democratic or Republican candidate on this or any other earth that would touch any of these recommendations with a ten foot pole.

Any gue$$e$ why???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nader is correct. This is such bullshit that oil charges so much based on speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yep he is correct
Shut down the speculators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Question: Would Saudi Arabia or Iran or Venezuela SELL crude at $50/bbl??
or Exxon or BP or....

Or will they shed crocodile tears all the way to the bank?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well...
Edited on Tue May-27-08 03:43 PM by Tandalayo_Scheisskop
Ralphie got this one right.

On Edit: I do not agree he gets everything right. This time, he most certainly did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush's policies have given these speculators ample excuse
to jerk up the price of oil.

1. Tax cuts for the wealthiest individuals reducing government receivables. (Financial)

2. No restraint whatsoever on earmarks mostly by the Republican led congress up until 2006 which led to budget deficits only increasing the national debt. (Financial)

3. Starting a premeditated war and threatening another in the region most awash with oil. (Psychological)

4. The war in Iraq is rife with corruption primarily benefiting corporations intimately tied with the Cheney/Bush Maladministration costing the U.S. infinitely more than "the war will pay for itself" propaganda being peddled by the neocons during the run up to war. (Psychological and Financial)

5. As the U.S.'s credibility around the world has taken a major hit by it's apparent corruption and mismanagement, the dollar; or U.S. Government's I.O.U. has melted against foreign currency, thus even as *the rest of the world pays similar prices for oil and gas, it's shooting up in the U.S. because of the weak dollar. (Psychological and Financial)

Final analysis, Cheney and Bush don't give a damn, they're just enriching their friends.


* This part is somewhat speculative on my part as I don't know what foreign nations are paying for oil and gas but as their currencies have increased in value compared to the dollar, I would be surprised if they had the same inflationary rate as the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm surprised that the doomsdayers haven't flooded this thread.
Edited on Tue May-27-08 04:08 PM by ryanmuegge
Nader is an unpopular figure here. Some people mistrust him so much but take Matt Simmons's words as absolute gospel.


Notice how the price decreased dramatically around the time of the 2006 midterms. I know as much about the nuances of the commodity markets as Flavor Flav, but it does seem to be a curious coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. flavor flav knows the time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Help_I_Live_In_Idaho Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, Let's Revolt
Trouble is nobody will ever even hold a sit in or a demonstration and even if we did it wouldn't work. So where is this "revolt?"
Nobody will join a revolt, nobody will do anything except buy perfume, zit cream and Ford Explorers.

The 60's are over and those of us who "revolted" are too old and we can see that the youth of today have no balls. So, we are all taking it in the ass while everyone does this talk.

Tell me what you will do Nader - Work through the system - Ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Youth of today
The youth of today would sprout balls that would knock their knees if the DRAFT was reinstituted!

-90% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yup, cause they're even (we're even?) lazier than any generation before
NO WAY would these entitled, easily-bored, SUV-driving, cell-phone-jabbering dipshits I see every day on this college campus be drafted. Bwhahahahahaha!

(I am largely anti-military, but I think a military type of wake up call would do them a lot of good - but should've been done by their parents, in childhood....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. This fits in with what the former Dir of the Commodities Futures markets said this am on C-Span
Edited on Tue May-27-08 04:33 PM by housewolf
Did you see C-Span's Washington Journal this morning?

Michael Greenberger, Trading Commission, Fmr. Dir. Commodities Futures

He had quite a bit to say about the record oil prices and the role of energy speculators on today's prices. He said that in Dec, 2000 Phil Graham (sp?) wangled through some legislation allowing Futures speculators to invest in basically unregulated markets - he called them "dark markets". Also called the "Enron Loop", it's the same legislation that allowed the Enron traders to do what they did outside of any regulation. According to him, this unregulated speculation is what's really causing the skyrocketing oil prices. He claims that after the fall of Enron, the Enron traders who knew their way around the "dark markets" were the most popular kids on the block and they they are involved in this speculative futures trading.

He's testifying to Congress about this next week. Here's a link to Washington Journal where there is a link and you can watch online.
http://c-span.org/Series/Washington-Journal.aspx

It was an eye-opener. Check it out if you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why is Stupaks bill bogged down, the PUMP act?
I don't get this stall it's under. It's about the Speculators in oil trades off shore, and how to hold them to account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craz3z Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Close the Enron Loophole
Repeal Royalty Relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Force speculators to actually take physical possession of that barrel of oil
or be hit with a 100% tax on their profits. I think this is one area where the national interest trumps the need to make a quick and easy buck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. Whatever his shortcomings, Nader always understood the importance of organizing
to limit corporate power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. Not surprising given the rapid drop in the value of the dollar.
Meatspace goods (food, oil, toilet paper, and soon water) are supplanting the dollar as things to bet on.

Nader is right, but that still doesn't make him righteous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. End oil speculation? Force trading back to regulated markets & raise margin requirements. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. K&R for Nader!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
21. Bush and Cheney MARINATED in OIL!
love that!

Chelsea Clinton works for a hedge fund company yes?
I'm sure her parents must have been her first two clients.
I'll bet most politicians are raking in $$$$ on their "investments"
Sure would be nice to know which ones were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auntarctica Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yergin says same thing
Daniel Yergin says the same thing - Exxon legally bids its own prices up....so do 20% of our gasoline stations on the oil futures market.....the real reason prices are so high is so that Bushies' oil buddies can get into as many wilderness areas as possible before Bush is gone. At $130 a barrel it is financially viable for them to drill anywhere, in any conditions - thus the leasing of areas like the Chukchi and Barents Seas....(notably all leases going to foreign oil companies, like Russia, China, etc). But before the U.S. gives up its SUVs we will allow oil profiteering and trashing of our last clean waters and pristine environments. Thanks Nader for saying this. Anyone who believes we have "peaked" in oil supplies needs to read Yergin's report on the subject and ask this key question: why is Bush's key energy advisor (remember those secret meetings?), Matthew Simons, the key person in the peak oil movement? (Hint: he is an oil energy investment banker, get it?).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC