Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The plus side of high food prices? Obesity battle among US children may have peaked

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:30 PM
Original message
The plus side of high food prices? Obesity battle among US children may have peaked
Edited on Tue May-27-08 04:30 PM by devilgrrl
I'm kidding btw...



CHICAGO - The percentage of American children who are overweight or obese appears to have leveled off after a 25-year increase, according to new figures that offer a glimmer of hope in an otherwise dismal battle.

"That is a first encouraging finding in what has been unremittingly bad news," said Dr. David Ludwig, director of an obesity clinic at Children's Hospital Boston. "But it's too soon to know if this really means we're beginning to make meaningful inroads into this epidemic. It may simply be a statistical fluke."

In 2003-04 and 2005-06, roughly 32 percent of children were overweight but not obese, 16 percent were obese and 11 percent were extremely obese, according to a study by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Those levels held steady after rising without interruption since 1980.

"Maybe there is some reason for a little bit of optimism," said CDC researcher Cynthia Ogden, the study's lead author.

Some experts said that if the leveling-off is real, it could be because more schools and parents are emphasizing better eating habits and more exercise. Even so, they and Ogden stressed that it would be premature to celebrate.

"Without a substantial decline in prevalence, the full impact of the childhood epidemic will continue to mount in coming years," Ludwig said. That is because it can take many years for obesity-related complications to translate into life-threatening events, including heart attacks and kidney failure.

He co-wrote an editorial accompanying the study in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association. He had no role in the research.

The results are based on 8,165 children ages 2 to 19 who participated in nationally representative government health surveys in 2003-04 and 2005-06.

more: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20080527/483b8740_3ca6_1552620080527665388661
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. nah, people will eat exclusively from the various "dollar menus" and less veggies
it's getting more expensive to eat healthy on a budget, but a double cheeseburger and fries is cheap.

If the economy goes further in the tank, families will be eating McFood out of the dumpsters....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unfortunately, the diet of poverty
is extremely fattening. High in sugar, starches & other cheap carbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unfortunately, obesity-promoting food is more likely to remain cheap, as nutritious food goes up.
Fresh, minimally-processed foods are the most expensive to get to market in good condition. They are the items with the soaring prices.

Food that is heavily-processed with long shelf life and high stability is cheaper to store and transport. It will remain at the most "affordable" end of the price scale, and remain the natural choice for budget-strapped families.

This will have little or no effect on obesity among children; if anything, it might cause it to start ticking up again.

The speculation that a current leveling-off is more related to conscious efforts at health promotion makes more sense than linking it to food price increases. The effort to promote health and obesity-prevention behaviors has been gathering steam for several years; the sharp rises in food prices are fairly recent.

objectively,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am eagerly awaiting the day when only the wealthy can afford to buy
soda and Twinkies. Let THEM suffer the health consequences of that crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC