Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can't our nominee easily win if we talk about the SUPREME COURT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 05:07 AM
Original message
Can't our nominee easily win if we talk about the SUPREME COURT?
Edited on Sat May-31-08 05:28 AM by Syrinx
I think the Supreme Court is 7 to 2, Republican-appointed to Democratic-appointed.

It's basically four to four, with Kennedy being the tiebreaker. And he seems to be heading, more and more, to the conservative side.

We need to make it the main issue -- how much the supreme law of the land will fundamentally change once McCain gets to put up to four justices on the court!

If the Republicans get even one more appointment, we are screwed.

Torture will be upheld.

The repeal of Habeas Corpus will be upheld.

Likewise, the repeal of Posse Comitatus.

The court will determine that the legislative branch has NO oversight authority over the executive branch, AT ALL.

ROE v. WADE will be reversed!

McCain says he will appoint people like Alito and Roberts, and Scalia. If he does, that will really, finally, be the "End Of America."

Shouldn't our nominee vigorously campaign on this issue?

And can't we easily win, if our nominee does vigorously campaign on this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. There are deep divisions in this nation re: Roe v. Wade, which is why
the Rs have been so successful. I think the restoration of habeus corpus is something that would be more productive as a campaign issue regarding the court. Right now we need to focus issues where there is common ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you're right
I think Roe has about 70% support nationwide, though.

But, Habeas Corpus, if people understood what it means, would be a near-universal area of agreement.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meiko Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. How would you know?
It has never been put to a vote as a national issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It would also remove any incentive for the Rs to gin up
the religious right and turn the whole GE in to a "my god is bigger than you godless atheists" circus. We need to drum religion out of politics and reinstitute separation of church and state, and this GE presents an opportunity to do just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes You are correct
And when Hillary stops distracting from this, most of her supporters will clearly see how terrible a McCain presidency would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not necessarily.
>>>Torture will be upheld.

The repeal of Habeas Corpus will be upheld.

Likewise, the repeal of Posse Comitatus.

The court will determine that the legislative branch has NO oversight authority over the executive branch, AT ALL.

ROE v. WADE will be reversed!
>>>>


There is a psychololgical undertow attached to each of these issues. While most people... issue by issue ... will probably share the DEM POV on the above, many voters base their decision on *feelings*. They prefer not to analyze too rigorously.

Torture and habeus corpus repeal appeal to the desire for order and safety. People don't consciously think: "I like torture"; they subconsciously think: "I'm really worried about terrorism and bad guys in general and want the gov't to be 'tough' on these threats." Legal specifics re. torture ( what it is and what it isn't) are boring and complicated and most will defer to the lawyers to hash those out.

Similarly, Roe v. Wade emotionally translates for many people not into a debate over abortion rights so much as the desireability of *abortion* as such. I.E. an unpleasant phenomenom. The prospect that they might themselves have to face an abortion-related dilemma at some point seems remote; so they'd prefer not to think about it beyond: abortion is a bad thing.

I'm not saying you're wrong, necessarily; I'm saying that SCOTUS has to be handled delicately by the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. People were campaigning on the basis of the Supreme Court in 2000
I recall buttons that said, "It's the Supreme Court, Stupid."

That was thought-provoking for people who actually know what the Supreme Court does and something of its history, but for the great masses of Americans who care more about the judging on American Idol than the judging of landmark court cases, it pretty much goes over their heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Keep in mind that the general public are not the political wonks we are.
Most people have no idea of the SCOTUS role in our government.

The only people it will galvanize are those that are force-fed their opinions on abortion, civil rights (against them, that is) and as we are discovering, that's a smaller amount of people than we thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. our nominee should educate
S/he should educate while campaigning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Most people lack the capacity for long-term strategic thinking
It's important for sure, but not a big selling point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Even if McCain is elected
The Democratic Party will retain control of the U.S. Senate. If McCain gets nominees like Alito or Scalia confirmed to the Supreme Court, it will be the responsibility of the Democratic members the Congress. I believe that it is reasonable McCain would nominate conservative judges to the Court, but I also believe if they get confirmed, it is the fault of the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC