Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John McCain on Women in the Military

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:06 PM
Original message
John McCain on Women in the Military
Women's combat roles are likely to be on next president's agenda

John McCain, after his release as a POW, said only men belong in battle. He stands by his record.
By Ralph Vartabedian, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
May 27, 2008

Soon after the Gulf War in 1991, a group of military women pressed Congress to allow female pilots to fly combat missions. But a Vietnam War hero in the Senate, John McCain, pushed back hard.

"The purpose of the military is first to defend this nation's vital security interests throughout the globe and only second to ensure equality,"
the Arizona Republican argued on the Senate floor, framing the issue in a way that infuriated feminists.

<snip>

McCain's aides said only that he stood by his past positions, suggesting that he would resist pressures for change.

In the 1991 debate over women pilots, McCain took a traditionalist stance. "This nation has existed for over 215 years," McCain said. "At no time in the history of our nation have women been in combat roles."

<snip>
McCain's long-standing opposition to women in combat has raised questions among his critics about his commitment to women's rights.

Women's groups say he has a weak legislative record on such issues as equal pay and workplace discrimination, and his support has lagged among female voters.

As a lawmaker, critics say, McCain sometimes has had strained relations with women in power. Former Rep. Patricia Schroeder (D-Colo.), who spearheaded the effort to grant women the right to fly in combat, called McCain a product of a "guy culture."

"He has always had trouble dealing with women as equals," Schroeder said.

<snip>

In an interview with Navy public relations officials after his release, McCain said women should never be allowed to enter combat. "Some of the people that might capture them can be pretty mean," he said.

<snip>

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-militarywomen27-2008may27,0,5521290.story?page=1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick - bookmark - recommend!. . I really don't think he likes women much.
He certainly doesn't have much respect for them..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep...Bookmarked....
so that Hillary-McCain supporters can see who they are supporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry, but I agree with McCain on this one.
I do not think women should be allowed to be captured. They are also raped by our own men. This was not a problem when I was in the army 50 years ago. It is not disrespectful of women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You do realize male soldiers are not treated well when captured either?
"I do not think women should be allowed to be captured." But men should? Being captured, tortured, raped, etc is not a fun experience for the men either - I do not understand the logic that thinks it's an acceptable burden for men to bear, but not women. Women - least of all military women who know what the reality of combat is like - are not delicate flowers that need to be "protected" from some hideous fate that it is somehow okay to subject our male soldiers to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Doing nothing will not result in the education of the ignorant
I am sure all those racists were not happy with Truman when he desegregated the armed forces.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'm not going to demonize him on this one, after what he went thru
I think that train has left the station however. Equal is equal.

Let's just shoot for less war, better yet, NO war, and then we won't have to worry about it.

And that's where McCain really falls short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. In those cases... the problem isn't with the women
The problem is that rape by their own is allowed, and not punished as harshly as it should be.

Blaming women for men's failings is never right.

And women AND men will be captured. And, guess what? Raped. That's the price that troops going into combat might pay. They all know it. There's absolutely no need to treat women differently there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. I see your point, but the military now needs a higher % of smart people and there are not enough...
men signing up who would make the cut.

Without a draft, it's all about the demographics of the folks who will enlist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. 1954 was sooo 15 minutes ago.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Soldiers raping women WAS a problem 50 years ago.
Soldiers of every nationality have been raping women as part of militarism for centuries, and your army of 50 years ago was no exception to that. Some of those were enemy women captured and raped, some were "comfort women" who were forced into prostitution.

Just because their skin was less white or they weren't wearing a US uniform doesn't make it any less of a rape.

Point being the problem isn't women serving in the military. The problem is men in the military committing rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Precisely--theoldman's post was a classic "blame the victim" gambit.
It's just in this case, it's proactive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. I hate to be the one to put it this way, but... and?
In the context of prisoners captured, with the Geneva conventions being ignored, is being raped REALLY that much worse than anything that can be done to a male soldier? Who can also be raped, I'll remind you. Beatings, cutting, drowning, electrocution, live dissection... it's a nasty list. The only way to prevent bad things from happening to captured soldiers is to not be captured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yet another example of how out of touch he is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killy Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. I know this probably won't be liked.
Edited on Sun Jun-08-08 09:33 PM by Killy
I know people are going to think of me as out of touch, or ignorant, or simply not thinking of women as equals, but to me on a very personal level - the idea of women being in combat, possibly being captured, raped, tortured or many other issues just hits me right down in the gut. It's an idea that I just can't look at from a purely objective point of view.

I will defend any woman's right to be in the army and right there with the men all along the way, but the idea is still a very terrifying and disturbing idea to me for all of the problems that it would bring to those women who get into the unfortunate situation of being captured and possibly mistreated by our own soldiers, other countries soldiers, or terrorists.

I would never dream of trying to deny a woman the right to do that if she wishes, but I could never like it or really feel like it was "right" to me, as a man, to possibly hear or see women in those situations.

EDIT: Not that it's ever right for anyone to be in those situations, but it would be especially terrifying and horrible when it's women in those situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I won't be popular for saying this either...
Edited on Sun Jun-08-08 09:37 PM by Raine1967
so let's be unpopular together... :)

Woman, if they choose to serve deserve all the rights, both good and bad that men have. That includes the right to be killed in war if they choose to serve.

Do you think for ONE minute if we ever have a draft that woman won't be a part of it? I am a woman and to me equality is equality. That means if my sisters chooses to serve, they should be able to serve equally with my brothers.

And to tell you a truth that scares the hell out of me. I have a niece, 13, and a nephew 10 who are looking at that very real possibility of the draft.

Equal is equal. As women, we can't have it both ways. If we are willing to call ourselves feminists and are willing to send our brothers, fathers and sons out there, we need to expect the same from ourselves. If we really want to be equals, we deserve the same right to die for our country, if we choose to sign up for the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Well, I suspect you're coming at this with
chivalrous intentions, but they backfire. Women and men will be mistreated when in enemy hands. That's probably a given, and one made more likely thanks to our recent torturing of prisoners.

But I think what you're missing here is that women are every bit as strong, emotionally, psychologically, as men. They may lack some of the male upper body strength, but they are *stronger* in a biological sense. Women deal with pain better, for instance. (I assume you've not personally given birth - believe me, we know from pain.)

And the kicker is that moving up in a military career really requires combat experience. Denying women who want it that opportunity denies them a chance to rise in the ranks. That's misplaced chivalry, I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killy Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I suppose.
Maybe so, even still I can't help how I feel about this. The idea of women being put in the front lines and possibly being killed, maimed, captured, tortured, raped or any other numerous problems that can occur just makes my skin crawl and my stomach churn. Yes, it's terrible when these things happen to men, but I just can't feel the same way. Maybe it's because I'm a man and I would gladly rather be drafted in place of a woman so she could live while I go off to die, but it's just something at the very core of who I am. Every fiber of my being tells me that a woman to be put in those situations is just wrong beyond wrong.

Even with all of that emotional programming, if there was a vote on it, I'd still vote yes for every woman to have that right. I may not like it, but I'll defend to the death your right to be there.

As for the not moving up in the ranks without combat experience, I admit that's pretty nasty as is, and I wish there was a way for women to move up even if they can't fight in battle. But, I'm not a military man, so I can't really say much about the validity of that idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Toward the end of this article they quote a
Edited on Sun Jun-08-08 09:51 PM by REDSTATELIBERAL
Col. Martha McSally as saying:
"The experience of Jessica Lynch, the celebrated Army private who was taken prisoner early in the Iraq war, illustrates the risks. She eventually revealed in her book that she was brutally beaten and raped."

Has anyone read Jessica Lynch's book? I checked Snope's and it doesn't show anything. I guess I never heard or read about rape. Anyone know this to be fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. In articles I have read about her, she has been reported to have said
that she was well treated by her captors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yes that is what I had read also, that she was treated well.
That is why I asked because it seemed so opposite of her statements at the time. I was wondering if this was part of some new mis-information being spread by Mc Same's team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. From what I have gathered Rick Bragg reveals this in a book about her.
There's still quite a bit of argument about just what happened to her, if you skim different articles about it. Whatever happened, that young woman went through quite an ordeal.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-11-06-lynch_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I have not read the book... BUT...
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-11-06-lynch_x.htm

This link says that she does not recall what happened to her. I personally feel that rape is just as bad as any other torture. I do. Having been raped, I don't think i would choose waterboarding over rape...

I do not mean to be so inflammatory, but I just think torture is awful. rape is not just a thing that is inflicted upon woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. I think that woman is mistaken.
If it's the book I'm thinking of, it wasn't Lynch's, really. And it provided no real evidence that she was assaulted. From what I know, I'd suspect that the evidence they allude to is actually a result of her injuries in the crash--it's complicated. But to my knowledge Lynch herself has never said she was raped, or even suggested it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
31. That's a lie. She didn't 'reveal' she 'repeated' what she was told
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 08:33 AM by lynnertic
because she was unconscious. We are told that her poor broken body did bear signs of rape.

She testified before the senate about a year ago that her rescue was staged.

On edit: sorry, it was staged for cameras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Women are just "C's" to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. OB/GYN's aren't able to practice their love with women
if they're killed in combat. That's what ole' George would say.

:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. It is way past time to remove that sexist restriction. And if we ever have a draft again there

should be no exemptions based on gender or race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. I would like to see women no longer in combat
and I would also like to see men no longer in combat. This is the twentyfirst century- lets end the concept that war is a way of solving anything.

And I would like to see McCain retired from public life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-08-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. His take on equal pay: "well, women just need more education and training"
BULLSHIT.

In addition to his stance on women in the military (and whatever anyone thinks about that), but his record on OTHER women's issues SUCKS!

The man is a misogynist pig duJour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. Monday kick. . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. one of the biggest problems we have with women in iraq
IS THAT THEY'RE BEING RAPED BY THEIR OWN COMRADES-IN-ARMS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC