If there's ONE THING that Congress SHOULD investigate

[Canuckistanian]

It's Bush's use of "signing statements".

Honestly, Bush's prolific use of the semi-legal "signing statements" makes a mockery of CONGRESS ITSELF.

Do they realize that so much of their hard-fought work in committees and reconciliations is being NULLIFIED by a small cabal of corrupt lawyers such as Addison and his ilk?

Do they have NO PRIDE in their work?

I dunno, maybe they have a different "view" of their Constitutional duties than I do.

But I would be ROYALLY PISSED OFF by people UNDOING all the hard work I was doing for my constituents.

[KingOfLostSouls]

1. I think they are

I could have sworn I'd seen something about Conyers looking into the legality of them, maybe a month or so ago.

[Breeze54]

2. You don't know JACK!

:puke:

[Canuckistanian]

4. What do you care?

You think this is all a joke anyways.

[malaise]

3. The entire Congress will soon sort that out

They will certainly not be allowing this to continue in the event that Obama wins. Watch the media raise all the Constitutional violations as the election approaches.

[TahitiNut]

5. "Full Committee Oversight Hearing on Signing Statements"

http://judiciary.house.gov/OversightOpeningStatement.aspx?ID=85