Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New book on RFK & J.E.HOOVER - how old Joe's stroke was the death card for the boys

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:41 AM
Original message
New book on RFK & J.E.HOOVER - how old Joe's stroke was the death card for the boys


*******QUOTE*******

http://www.nypost.com/seven/06122008/gossip/liz/reliving_the_kennedys_history_115191.htm?page=0

RELIVING THE KENNEDYS' HISTORY



June 12, 2008 -- 'I COULDN'T stop reading this book!" says Liz. When "Bobby and J. Edgar" by Burton Hersh first passed over my desk, my thought was, "Oh, no, not more of this stuff!" And, like most people who read a little bit and keep up with current history, I felt I already knew everything that could possibly be written.

Boy! Oh boy! Was I ever wrong? Mr. Hersh has been examining the Kennedy family for 35 years. He is a biographer of Teddy. But here he starts with the rise of old Joe Kennedy as the nation's premier bootlegger and of his close confidant/pal J. Edgar Hoover, a Depression-era dictator who helped form the FBI. Hersh brings all of the repercussions of their relationship right up to the present. What's more, he offers hundreds of acute examples, digressions and points of view I never knew or considered before - and although sometimes I quarreled with his sarcastic and unnecessary descriptions - his overall history is so compelling, so fresh, so anecdotally different from other writers that I felt I was reliving history. ....

THERE IS another interesting Hersh theory in this book - that from the moment Joe Kennedy suffered a stroke on the golf course and was left by his wife lying unattended at home for many hours - the fortunate days of his sons were numbered. Rose Kennedy supposedly said when told of Joe's fall, "Oh, my poor boys, my poor boys!" Without Daddy's firm hand, they more or less fell apart.

Hersh also gives Hoover a few good marks. J. Edgar organized the FBI into a rigid force with some silly rules about dress, etc., but better than we could have expected in that, at least, Hoover wasn't assembling power and troops to try to take over the country. He was content to be a petty tyrant and subvert justice on a personal scale that suited him. In the end, he and Bobby hated each other passionately, so that even a long friendship with old Joe could not ameliorate the situation.

Likewise, Hersh, although scathing about Bobby as compared to Jack (one was ruthless, short and short on charm, and the other seems to have had grace and common sense) - in the end gives Bobby his due. Not just as a charismatic politician with idealistic intentions, but as a person who saved the US during the Cuban missile crisis. It is the Hersh contention that JFK was sick during that crucial moment and Bobby kept the world from nuclear holocaust.

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. I just cannot believe anything from Murdock's paper. Think I'll pass
on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wish you had passed on the thread
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 11:57 AM by UTUSN
Liz SMITH has billed herself for years as the only Dem working at the NY Post. That said, her two gossiper colleagues, while undeniably wingnut, are better journalists in their sourcing than many, even most, of those in the mainstream who call themselves "journalists," starting with G.E.RUSSERT and Tweety.


As for MURDOCH, he does *not* stay up nights dictating what these employees of his can or should say. As a Brit DUer posted here a few weeks ago, it's not beyond him to switch sides for the pragmatic purposes of raking in cash and cozying up to whoever is in power, the way he switched the Sun when Tony BLAIR was poised to take power for Labor. There's a rumor going around he just might fire Roger AILES, so what will you make of that?!1


I sure wish groupthinkers would just skip on down the road when they are faced with whatever it is that challenges their brain rigor mortis. I'm too old to quake when somebody throws up a flashcard with some word like "MURDOCH" on it. Maybe that's why I, more often than not, (ruefully) LAUGHED when Shrub-CHEENEE tried to scare us with terrarists on monkey bars and why I do not believe that Shrub has has anything to do with our "not having been attacked in 6 yrs."


But thanks (not) for dropping in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. No problem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. my mother if she were alive would say "AHA, I knew SOMEBODY was behind
all three assassinations" (she always believed the RFK and MLK shootings were linked )

However she always thought it was Nixon. Man did she hate Nixon.

but she loved conspiracy theories and this would have fascinated her. :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC