Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Amazing Map Showing Impact of Gas Prices on a Percentage of Income Basis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:47 AM
Original message
Amazing Map Showing Impact of Gas Prices on a Percentage of Income Basis
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 10:23 AM by bullwinkle428




http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/06/09/business/20080609_GAS_GRAPHIC.html#tab1


Notice where it appears to impact the hardest - don't those areas (with a few exceptions) look suspiciously like the usual RED areas, demographically speaking; i.e., Republican strongholds?

You can also click on the tabs to see the gas prices and median incomes separately...

I mentioned in a reply downthread that this was not intended to be a "Ha-ha...that's what you get for voting for Bush!" kind of posts, which do happen from time to time here.

The overriding point of my posting this article was that the major impact of the price increases might actually result in a change in thinking on the part of many voters in these particular areas.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not a perfect screen grab but close enough


fyi, I centered the picture and then hit Alt-prnt Scrn and then pasted it into MSPaint. Then I saved it and uploaded it to photobucket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Looks to me like a picture of poverty
Gas prices as compared to income: gas prices are about the same across the country, income varies greatly. And, yes, red states have lower incomes. You'd think they would vote blue, since that's where their economic interest lies, but I guess low income states also have large pockets of low information voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedleyMisty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. And that is why hating on "red states" oozes with classism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob Dobbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. More correctly, stupidism.
Voting against your best interests because of peripheral wedge issues is not real intelligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Exactly!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Looks to me like those areas with good public transportation options
are much better off than those without ANY public transportation. I'll say it again: we need to invest in a Nation high speed MagLev rail system with light rail connectors, and we need to invest in solar farms for rural areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Algal oil farms! And we need fewer rural areas
That's part of the problem, people are too spread out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. There's the plan, let's turn the entire nation into one big city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Less environmental impact that way, and
Could more effectively use our resources to benefit the max number of people. Not that you could do something like this with social engineering but I think that with the cost of transportation going up, things will trend this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. The steady rise in gas prices may nudge our politicians toward public transportation
I certainly hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Price equalization had long happened
in the fast food and casual restaurant prices. No matter where you went, it seemed you'd spend around $5 for drinks or a quick bite and around $10 for lunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. EXACTLY! Yet, it's so "progressive" to wish ill to these people, and look down on them.
Liberal elitism at it's best.

:banghead:

What the hell does it take for "progressives" to GET IT????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I appreciate you doing this for me!
This may be a case of a picture being worth a thousand words, so it might help drive the point home a bit better to have it sitting there in plain sight.

I'll try to remember the steps for the next time I want to post image and can't do it the "standard" way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. If it's not too late to edit your post
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 10:19 AM by Mabus
you can add it to your OP.

Remove the spaces between the "//" and the "i2" http:// i2.photobucket.com/albums/y33/KSNewsJunkie/gasprices-1.jpg

Or you can right click on my graphic and copy the link. This second option might be easier.


Glad I could help out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. hardest hit areas have the least amount of mass transit. the west
is screwed over every time. Also my state is not there. We are screwed period. we have two highways and almost no mass transit. Gas in Barrow, Alaska is imported and although I have been trying to find out its cost, have failed so far.

EDIT: It is $6.07 a gallon in Bethel, Alaska. Can't find gas stations in Barrow but Bethel is way out west and has to import everything too. Milk was $8.99 a gallon in Barrow last time I checked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Don't I know it?
We moved from Kansas to Maryland this year. Back in Kansas we didn't have mass transit that would outside my city limits. Both the city and university had bus lines but there were so many transfers to get where I was going that there were fewer headaches and it was easier to just drive. Plus, most of the bus routes I needed to use shut down whenever the university was on break.

Here, there's a bus stop around the corner and the Metro is about a mile away. It's almost too convenient not to use. We've gone from filling up car once a week or so to filling up once a month, if that. We've been here for just over six months and I have filled our tank (6 gallons, we drive a Honda Civic) seven times. I've been keeping track.

Mass transit is great if you have it. Here the system is well-planned, convenient and fast. I was a little reluctant to use it at first but it's just too damned convenient not to use it. Plus, I'm not limited to just my city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well...yeah
Red areas tend to be lower population density, lower income, with a larger need for trucks and suv's. Hence gas prices will hit them by far the hardest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Very true - I should have added the accompanying article
and it's link as well:

TCHULA, Miss. — Gasoline prices reached a national average of $4 a gallon for the first time over the weekend, adding more strain to motorists across the country. Josephine Cage says her 30-mile commute to a fish processing plant costs $200 a month, or nearly 20 percent of her pay.

But the pain is not being felt uniformly. Across broad swaths of the South, Southwest and the upper Great Plains, the combination of low incomes, high gas prices and heavy dependence on pickup trucks and vans is putting an even tighter squeeze on family budgets.

Here in the Mississippi Delta, some farm workers are borrowing money from their bosses so they can fill their tanks and get to work. Some are switching jobs for shorter commutes.

People are giving up meat so they can buy fuel. Gasoline theft is rising. And drivers are running out of gas more often, leaving their cars by the side of the road until they can scrape together gas money.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/09/business/09gas.html?_r=4&th=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&emc=th&adxnnlx=1213283155-rdsOGRlo5h3FvVTiLxbWbA



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ummmmm
Two things:

(1) That is a pretty useless map. It measures gas prices relative to median income. Median not mean. So it does not reflect averages. Even if it did there would still be a farily significant number of outliers.

(2) There are Dems who live in those red states. They work and are paid according to the prevailing wages in the area. And they pay market prices for gas. What you may think of as red state pain is a very real issue to some fellow Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. The overriding point of my posting this article was that
the major impact of the price increases might actually result in a change in thinking on the part of many voters in these particular areas.

It was NOT intended to be a "Ha-ha...that's what you get for voting for Bush!" kind of posts, which do happen from time to time here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. The map still isn't a good reflection of what is actually happening
Given a situation where the median household income is $38,000, the per capita income is $21,000 and the mean household income is $50,000:

(1) There will be a more significant impact in an area where there is little or no access to public transportation.
(2) There will be a greater impact where the mean and median income figures have less disparity.
(3) Add the fact that only 8% of households have incomes in excess of $100,000 and about 25% of the households have earnings between $50,000 and $100,000. There is likely a greater impact than what the data might suggest. Only about one third of all households have earnings in excess of the mean. And household earnings here are among the highest in the state.

The above data describes Tulsa - a gray shaded red state area.

Now lets look at an orange colored area in far Southeast Oklahoma. In McCurtain county nearly 25% of the population lives in poverty. It is one of the poorest counties in Oklahoma. The entire county population is less than 35,000 people and is declining. What kind of public transportation do you think is available in McCurtain county? The unemployment rate is above average and has consistently been above the state average for decades. Per capita income is about $18,000. Median household income is about $24,000. Mean household earnings income is less than $35,000. Mean household income considering all sources of income is even lower. A state prepared report analyzing economic conditions in 2003 found:

"The county has 13,828 housing units and 73.1% of these are owner occupied. The median home value in the county is $29,200, the median housing rental contract is $146.00 per month and statewide housing units number 1,406,499 of which 68.1% are owner occupied. The statewide median home value is $48,100."



Like another poster suggested, what this map depicts is poverty. In wealthier areas the map ignores relevant factors such as income disparity and access to public transportation. Most areas that are poor have been poor for a long period of time. Increasing gas prices in these areas only further reduce quality of life among those who live there. IMHO it is wishful thinking to hope for this to change long held political views - though one can certainly hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. This seems to assume all people drive the same vehicle and the same distances doesn't it?
In every debate on gas consumption I have seen no one takes into consideration the variables of how far a person drives in relation to the mpg of the vehicle the drive.

In CA many people have long commutes and drive in bumper to bumper traffic which has a large impact on how much gas they buy and if they are driving vehicles that get poor gas mileage it is also a factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. That's another big factor that I hadn't considered, and it
does not appear to have been taken into account for this study either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. I was about to say
the chart apparently doesn't take commute distances into consideration, but merely figures average income ('1') with average fuel price ('1') and gets '3'.

I don't have any figures, but I'd be willing to bet that many people in my area of California (just south of San Francisco Bay) now spend more than 3-5 percent of their income on gasoline, or, at least, it's on the high end of that range. Roughly one-third of this county's working population commute to Silicon Valley, which is 40-50 miles each way. And, by my own estimation, many drive SUVs.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. And the drive slowly don't they. I use to have to go to Fremont and people were full of road rage
when they got to work in the morning after a 45 minute commute of 10 or 15 miles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Depends on conditions, I guess
If there're no accidents or rain or anything, it seems to flow at about 65 — at least, if you believe "Traffic and weather together every 10 minutes" or whatever. But, one fender-bender can glom up miles of freeway for awhile, and that's to say nothing of surface streets like El Camino Real.

It got a lot better for local commuters a few years ago when Caltrans finally widened the stretch of 101 between Mortgage Hill and 85 in San Jose, but there's still no way in hell I'd live like that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. I once read 39% of mississippi families are working poor
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 10:29 AM by Juche
After the economic state we are in it is probably closer to 45%. Combine that with the pickup culture and the higher gas prices (as well as higher healthcare and real estate) and I have no idea how they are making do down in areas like Mississippi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
20. Of course the places with the most poverty are the hardest hit.
It's not like there's a progressive scale of gas prices or anything. Maybe there should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. If those areas do indeed support McBush,
it will prove that (sociologically at least) the stupid people stayed on the farm while everyone else moved to the city.

My roots are southern and country, but the pig-headed obstinance with which these people act against their own best interests has no explanation other than stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
24. I don't see our rich, powerful Democratic legislators from the SF Bay area doing squat about it
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 11:57 AM by slackmaster
We work, they live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
30. Another one of those "Screw the poor people for their own good" posts, eh?
How really "progressive" and "liberal" of you.

This is good information, but for exactly the opposite reason of what you post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. The map can be a little bit misleading
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 04:26 PM by Wednesdays
Because it doesn't take into account how high prices are for other things, which affects the percentage spent on gas.

For example, in places such as California and urban areas in the northeast, where rent and mortgage costs are extremely high, fuel costs won't be as much because housing takes such a large chunk of the pie. On the other hand, here in Oklahoma housing and rent are far cheaper, so then of course other things such as gas would take a larger slice. We bought a brand-new house, nice and 1700 square foot, in a really nice neighborhood in suburban Oklahoma City in 1998, for $110,000. In some areas of the country, you couldn't buy a shack for that much.

I'm not sure if the higher gas prices are having a greater effect on people's attitudes here, as opposed to the rest of the country. Sure, no one's happy about it, and there is a *slight* movement towards conservation (there are more motorcycles and scooters around than a few years ago), but by and large people seem to be going about their business as though everything was normal. There are still LOTS of SUVs, Humvees, and monster-sized pickups all over the highways, and the Repuke politicians are chanting "Drill the ANWR!!" and "Build more refineries!" (paraphrased from an actual flier we received by our good (cough) Congresscritter Mary Fallin, just yesterday). :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC