Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC BREAKING NEWS: President Bush to lift executive ban on offshore drilling, White House says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:07 AM
Original message
MSNBC BREAKING NEWS: President Bush to lift executive ban on offshore drilling, White House says

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/

BREAKING NEWS: President Bush to lift executive ban on offshore drilling, White House says



banner @ top of page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anything, ANYTHING to prevent conservation!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is he the only barrier to it or do the states and congress have a say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't think it's that simple--
I think there will be roadblocks before oil companies can actually act on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. congress must lift its ban too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patriotvoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
53. States also have their own shore regulations.
North Carolina, for example, prohibits drilling within U.S. waters off of the NC coast. Therefore, NC state law would have to change to allow for off-NC-shore drilling. You probably won't be surprised to learn, however, that there are motions already being made within the NC General Assembly to allow for "exploration".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. oh this
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 09:10 AM by alyce douglas
fucking man has no shame and is just plain evil. He really needs his ARROGANT ass kicked to the curb. We have to stop this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. We aren't yelling "Uncle!" soon enough?
Sorry Bush, but you should know you can't rely on peons...particularly when they are being peed on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Congress and the states have a vote in this matter too.
Although I believe it's posturing on the WH's part for congressional and senatorial elections. If dems try to introduce legislation to protect offshore points from oil drilling, they'll be pounced upon for ruining the economy by maintaining high fuel prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. It strikes me as political posturing/panering to set up elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. ruining the economy by maintaining high fuel prices? oil companies exporting fuel at record levels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. the son of a bitch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. Exactly.
In doing this dubya puts the gas prices squarely on the dems heads. If they vote no, the people will be told that it's the dems fault we have high gas prices. If they vote yes, they pander to the ones who will tear our environment apart and never look back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. If the Dems vote for this I hope Al Gore leaves
the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. my state, calif, will have a fit. Me right along with em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Well, yesterday Arnold was defending the act of 'flip-flopping'...
but, I would be surprised if Arnold changes his mind
and pushes for drilling off the California Coast.


Tikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. so will states rights overide the federal ok to drill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. CA doesn't want off shore drilling...
the State would just keep pushing back
for a long time.

Tikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tburnsten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
45. I think this makes it a state issue now
or it will be, if congress lifts the congressional ban. Once that happens, it will be up to the states in question to decide whether or not to allow drilling. I personally think that drilling would be fine, so long as much of the oil we bring up is expressly dedicated to getting long-term renewable energy sources like wind farms and hydro-electric power up and running. I am concerned that we will run out of the oil we need to get those true clean power sources up before they are viable, which would be disastrous. once we have a significant amount of natural electric farms, dams, and tidal power stations up I think our need for oil as a less-expensive home and business heating fuel will decrease, since we could hopefully reduce the cost of electricity to the point that it is the cheapest way to heat homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #21
50. Not likely ...
Fight Over Florida Coast Oil Intensifies Around Energy Bill



July 29, 2005 – The congressional push to drill for oil off Florida's Gulf coast reached a climax this week as House and Senate negotiators worked to meet a compromise on a massive energy legislation package. While lawmakers worked to hammer out an agreement that could pass both chambers of Congress, the White House was pushing for new rules that would change Florida's state boundaries at sea, opening a controversial area up for drilling despite major homegrown opposition to throughout the state.

Last Friday, Florida Senator Bill Nelson, a Democrat, released a leaked White House email that urged negotiating lawmakers to adopt a Bush administration's plan to redraw offshore state boundaries in the Gulf of Mexico and grant Louisiana control over waters currently controlled by Florida.

The New Standard



Last time I checked, changing a state's boundary required U.S. constitutional amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. there's no voting on this one. it's an executive order. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
61. yes but it's only half of what would be required. Congress has to lift their ban too. n/t
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 12:14 PM by ourbluenation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freesqueeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. we could see it coming
all this coordinated nonsense from the GOPeople about you domestic drilling bans are the problem with gas prices. Then here comes this inevitable before the truth about refinery limits can be explained.

Florida, California (and all those US beaches with actual waves) let me introduce you to the tar stations of the beaches of Texas where we allow offshore drilling.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/environment/water/article634009.ece

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. You have stories like this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3612752

And he responds by opening drilling. Amazing. He really does want to leave nothing but scorched earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. he is a defiant little
PRICK isn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. Funny, since his DAD signed it in the first place.
I don't think most people know that Poppy himself initiated the ban in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
17. Ah FUCK!
There goes the beautiful sunset off the coast of Florida
What a crying fucking shame

The emerald and blue waters that once lapped at the white sand beaches.

And for what? A few fucking cents of a fucking barrel of oil 10 years from NOW!


These fuckers need to be strung up and dragged through the streets. That is the only punishment suitable for the crimes they have committed against this world.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. Congress must still lift legislative ban before offshore drilling can start
any bets on THIS congress??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Hear that sound?
Sounds like a cave-in is coming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. rumble...rumble...
A wall of obsequy has crushed the Capitol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. I Hear They Got Oil Rigs Targeted For Just Off The Coast Of Naples, Florida.......
those Repugs down there would really support * on this one. (sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
23. Too bad we don't have the rigs. Too bad we don't have the crews. Too bad there's not enough oil.
Too bad it wouldn't make a damn bit of difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
24. Isn't there anything else left he hasn't plundered?
Is he going to just take whatever money is sitting in the social security coffers and fly off to venezuela with it?

He gets away with everything. What incentive have we given him to stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
27. Foul beaches while the fouling's good, ExxonMobil
This ain't gonna last forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
28. Now Bush needs to push through a big tax cut and (more) subsidies for the struggling oil companies.
That should make everything better. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
29. Why that filthy, dirty, disgusting


Oh I am so fucking pissed:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
30. and president obama can reinstate it as soon as he's sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. Yes he will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
34. If it was that simple, why did he wait so long ??
Why didn't he do this a long time ago ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. I'm still hearing and reading that Congress needs to do it too
I'm more worried about the Corporate Socialism bailout that's happening.
I think this offshore drilling thing is an election hedge issue that they
figured they could run with when you have a misinformed voter.

The Democratic Party needs to start a counter campaign and get their best
talking heads out in the media to explain the 20 year lapse before
one drop of oil comes to the corporate refineries.

California will fight it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. now he can blame the entire energy crisis on the democrats...cause they oppose drilling
he can beat up on congress and obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
46. It's not that easy. There is a Federal Law that would still be in effect after lifting the exec ord
Congress would have to repeal that law in order for them to be able to drill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
35. Disater capitalism. This does nothing to help our situation, but it does
turn over more of our commonly held property to corporate interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpominville Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
37. Gas Prices Continue to Rise
This is just meaningless political theater designed to take advantage of the public's desperation. This will do nothing to lower gas prices. All it will do is hand over billions more taxpayer dollars to the oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
40. Apparently, Congress can weigh in on this executive order...
Anybody laying bets on how fast the WeenieCrats cave-in on this?

I'm so depressed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
briv1016 Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
41. White House: Bush to lift offshore drilling ban (AP)
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 11:18 AM by briv1016
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25674571/

WASHINGTON - In another push to deal with soaring gas prices, President Bush on Monday will lift an executive ban on offshore drilling that his stood since his father was president. But the move, by itself, will do nothing unless Congress acts as well.

The president plans to officially lift the ban and then explain his actions in a Rose Garden statement, White House press secretary Dana Perino said.

There are two prohibitions on offshore drilling, one imposed by Congress and another by executive order signed by former President Bush in 1990. The current president, trying to ease market tensions and boost supply, called last month for Congress to lift its prohibition before he did so himself.

But Perino said Bush no longer wants to wait. She pinned blame on the leaders of the Democratic Congress, noting that no action has been taken on this issue.

“They haven’t even held a single hearing,” Perino said. “So we are going to move forward, and hopefully that will spur action by the Congress.”

Asked if Bush’s action alone will lead to more oil drilling, Perino said, “In terms of allowing more exploration to go forward? No, it does not.”

The president, in his final months of office, has responded to record gas-prices with a series of proposals, including more oil exploration. None would have immediate impact on prices at the pump, according to White House officials, who say there is no quick fix. But starting action now would help, they say.

Bush’s proposal echoes a call by Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, to open the Continental Shelf for exploration.

Congressional Democrats have rejected the push to lift the drilling moratorium, accusing the president of hoping the U.S. can drill its way out a problem.

Bush says offshore drilling could yield up to 18 billion barrels of oil over time, although it would take years for production to start. Bush also says offshore drilling would take pressure off prices over time. In addition, the president has proposed opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for drilling, lifting restrictions on oil shale leasing in the Green River Basin of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming and easing the regulatory process to expand oil refining capacity.

Congressional Democrats, joined by some GOP lawmakers from coastal states, have opposed lifting the prohibition that has barred energy companies from waters along both the East and West coasts and in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. A succession of presidents, from Bush’s father — George H.W. Bush — to Bill Clinton, have sided against drilling in these waters, as has Congress each year for 27 years. Their goal has to been to protect beaches and coastal states’ tourism economies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
42. Makes me wish Carter was still president
Never mind the fact I wasn't born during Carter's presidency (1981... first year of Reagan, ugh). Many years later, I heard about Carter putting solar panels on the white house roof. \

Then that eejit Reagan removed them. How I surely wish our next president (Obama) follows Carter's lead on energy saving.

It's really important in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
43. Something I never understood
What reasons do the oil give for not driling in all the land that is already leased to them? Whenever a Dem brings it up during a debate on TV with a Repub that questions is never answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
44. This basically does nothing. There is still a federal law in place banning the drilling.
Let's not get overly upset about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
47. Fucking idiot!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
48. So, that's why gas has been $4.50/gallon!
It's a f*#king set-up to starve the addicts (that's us, who have no choice but to drive) into accepting the "need" to lift this ban.

I'm so surprised. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
49. Apparently it is not possible for Republicans to tell the truth.
Rather than admit what everyone knows - we could drill everywhere and it won't amount to anything - Shrub pulls political, feel good bullshit. The sheeple figure he's trying to get gas prices down . . . what a great guy. It makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
51. CALM DOWN EVERYBODY. The exec order was in place before
Congress enacted a law to do the same thing. Removing the ban doesn't make anything different unless Congress repeals the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. Exactly - will Congress cave? That is now the question.
Tighten your seatbelts - it's gonna be a rough ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
52. NO mention of SAFEGUARDS ??!?!!?
It's clear the oil barrons don't plan to offer any safeguards rto prevent spills or clean up after the inevitable spill happens (see the 20 year old/recent Valdez case). So now big oil is free to steep all our shores in crude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
54. the democrats better get on top of this immediately cause the media will mimmick bu$h*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
56. Becaue the surest way to lower gas prices is to give oil companies everything they want.
I know republican loyalists are just a few clicks north of functionally retarded, but are even they dumb enough to believe this shit? No, don't bother to answer that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
57. Un fucking believable. This is like giving the alcoholic the keys to the liquor cabinet.
He still is totally fucking clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
58. OH NANCY!!! IMPECH THE FUCKER ALREADY!....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
59. Disgusting -and I pity the dittoheads that think this will actually do anything about oil prices.nt
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 12:08 PM by nam78_two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
60. A Republican told me that it was all Pelosi's fault that we couldn't drill off the coast.
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 12:12 PM by progressoid
I guess she won't want to know that her pal Bush didn't lift a finger for 7+ years either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrata08 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
62. The OIL man's dream
This is what the Big Cats have been waiting for. Finally we can tap the oil off shore, the government drill them on refineries and guess what they would build them close to the people who don't have a voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC