Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GM eliminating healthcare coverage for SALARIED retirees over 65

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:27 AM
Original message
GM eliminating healthcare coverage for SALARIED retirees over 65
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080715/BUSINESS01/80715027

GM plans:

• Salaried workforce job and compensation cuts

• To reduce its salaried workforce in the U.S. and Canada in 2008 through attrition, early retirements, mutual separation programs and “other separation tools.”

• To eliminate health care coverage for U.S. salaried retirees over 65 years old effective Jan. 1, 2009. Affected retirees and surviving spouses will receive a pension increase from GM’s overfunded U.S. salaried plan to help offset costs of Medicare and supplemental coverage.

• To freeze base compensation for U.S. and Canadian salaried employees for the remainder of 2008 and 2009.

• To eliminate annual discretionary cash bonuses for the company’s executive group in 2008.

• To reduce executive group cash compensation for 2008.

more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. The reason that GM can change whatever they want for
salaried employees is that salaried employees do not have a written CONTRACT. Those promises made about medical benefits etc in employer written lit are not legal CONTRACTS. I am sure that GM's union members had a legal contract spelling out their benefits so GM would be in legal trouble if they change the terms of a contract.

I know this because my husband was a salaried employee who lost medical benefits promised in written lit. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, but the salaried employees lost. The workers in the union did not lose their benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That gives them something in common with all the non-union Toyota and Honda workers
Want to guess if Toyota decides to fund lavish retirements for their non-union US workers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Eliminate bounses???
They must REALLY be in trouble!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Can't get around that old minimum wage, Mortimer"
Well, we'll see. Nothing in this little laundry list of plans about re-tooling the product line, just cutting compensation for the workers. Apparently, the cars will build themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. The question now seems to be. Who's going to buy GM out?
Honda? Toyota? WalMart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. None of the above... remember that GM (tm) is a M A J O R war-profiteer
they make war toys, and as long as there's war....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC