Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Somethings Up With Bush and Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:39 PM
Original message
Somethings Up With Bush and Iran
Bush must have been up to something with Iran and got caught red-handed. It is the only thing that would cause him to so starkly reverse course and do what Obama and other Democrats have been saying to do all along: engage in talks.

What could have Bush been up to? Starting another War? Sending WMD to Israel? I can't even imagine what it was that has yanked Bush so completely against himself that now he's willing to "engage in talks with the enemy" as McCain has so often said.

What do you think it could be?

(for reference: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/16/us.iran/index.html)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. One thing you can count on: he is lying or using . . . what was that
word opposames or something? Like the "Clean Air Act". Whatever he says, he means the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Total econimic collapse
and blamed on him. Remember, he believes that history will vindicate him e v e n t u a l l y.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Thats my leading theory. And if the economy is so bad that they pass on another round
of blood and oil cocktails, we are in deep . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm starting to go with the checklist theory - one more thing on the way to declaring war
see, they tried sort of almost talking and it didn't work...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6509067
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ugh, that makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. yeah, I was in the same place as you - what is up - and then 2 people have suggested that.
The parallels with Iraq are disturbing.

At least the diplomat, Burns, sounds relatively reasonable for a BushCo person - maybe he came up through Dept. of State?

He testified at both foreign relations committees -

Senate - http://foreign.senate.gov/hearings/2008/hrg080709p.html (video link at top, fast forward 45 min in or so)

House - don't have a link but the questioning from Ron Paul is in the Video forum here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Engage in talks. Say "I tried; the talks failed." Start bombing.
There's nothing to talk about. Iran has a peaceful energy program per the IAEA and they are legally allowed to have it. I think it's posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush's ship is sinking. He's a rat. What else do we need to know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Russian Oil Deal ?
Russia just signed a huge oil deal with Iran. Russia also promised to "assist" Iran in the case of interference. Maybe Smirk Boy got the message?

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2008/me_oil0332_07_15.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. You may be on to something
Now that Russia has a stake in Iranian oil fields (purposely?), they're not about to hand them over to America.

The game is afoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. BINGO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. This fits with Gazprom offering to buy ALL of Libya's gas and oil output ...
a few days back. Russia is trying to form a cartel much larger than OPEC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. One could hit that motherfucker in the head with a board and he wouldn't get a message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Afghanistan and Pakistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush? Talk? Impossible. And that includes the syncophants on his "staff"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. We're choosing oil, rather than Israel.
Oil at $145 is killing the economy. They're trying to get the "Iran premium" on the oil price to go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. also a reasonable theory if they think people will vote based on that.
seems awfully early for that move though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. they could do that by closing the Enron loophole. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nothing more interesting than drilling/refinery contracts.
Iran is privatizing their energy sector, Halliburton wants the contracts.

Bombing cancelled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Angry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. Money, and PILES of it.

If Bush were to line up an agreement with Ahmadinejad, it would make it look like he was the great diplomat by destroying Iraq and using it to scare Iran and North Korea.

Only after the election would we find out that the agreement happened and that huge bribery was involved.

Who here can honestly say that this is completely impossible with that schmuck in our White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. I do not believe the US will or can attack Iran.
He has no other choice but to negotiate in my opinion. The military has been weakened by the fiasco he lied us into. Our allies are no longer going to support our dreams of empire. He doesn't have the military power to attack Iran and hang on to the oil we stole in Iraq. China and Russia will not allow us to attack Iran without some type of response either military or economic and we can't afford to take a hit economically right now and even the Bush Gang realizes that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I think your dead nuts on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loudmxr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. Time is running out for Bush- time to think about legacy
Consider the BBC report that we may be opening a diplomatic office in Tehran. The nuke talks. The sudden desire to bring massive amounts of troops home before September like he said. The increased effort to find and kill bin Laden.

He wants to be the "peace president". He is taking the war off the table.

I know its wierd but you gotta consider what an ill man he is. He is facing being "the worst president ever". Worst than J.Q. Adams the other son of a president. The one who was not elected by popular vote. The one historians will really compare him too.

The repugs have abandonded him so this is a real FU to them. This leaves them with only the economy to fight on which the Democrats are more trusted on.

It is now all about him. His place in history. His legacy. Me. Me. Me.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. with bush the decision to bomb Iran is already in the works, all he's doing now with this is
so he can say later that he tried diplomacy. The decision to bomb has already been made, that I would bet on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC