Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good-bye, Google Bomb

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:37 AM
Original message
Good-bye, Google Bomb
Bloggers, take note: the old-school Google bomb is no more.

That's right, the online behemoth best known for its search engine says that it has rejiggered its legendary and proprietary technology so that online efforts by bloggers to manipulate its top-secret search algorithm to create cheeky, offensive and decidedly off-message answers to searches will no longer work.

"It was fun" while it lasted, said Rick Klau, a member of the Google strategic partner development content acquisition team, at a search engine optimization training session for political bloggers in Washington, D.C., this afternoon. But, he said, "Google bombs don't work anymore."

Indeed, the changes to eliminate Google bombs were instituted more than a year-and-a-half ago. But that hasn't stopped political bloggers of the left and right, who have announced (or worried over) fresh efforts to manipulate search engine rankings as recently as this May (see here) and June (see here, and here).

Here's how the old Google bombs worked: Say a group of people wanted to associate a certain Washington politician -- let's call him Mr. Smith -- with a particular insult -- like sleazeball -- and have articles about Mr. Smith come up high in Google search results when people search for the keyword, sleazeball. They would all link to Mr. Smith's Web page, wrapping the link's HTML code around the word sleazeball.

Presto-chango: Via the links, the algorithm made a connection between the name and the subject matter, and adjusted accordingly.

That doesn't work anymore, said Klau, because the company today can spot these swarms and neutralize their effect. "We are far more perceptive when it comes to these link swarms that show up in a matter of hours or days," said Klau.

<snip>

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/07/23/goodbye_google_bomb.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Santorum still works. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There's no defense against the truth. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. As in spreading?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Also:
Edited on Thu Jul-24-08 02:01 PM by IanDB1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. So I guess Google Bombs were a "MISERABLE FAILURE"?



:shrug:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Google Kills Bush's Miserable Failure Search & Other Google Bombs
Google Kills Bush's Miserable Failure Search & Other Google Bombs
After just over two years, Google has finally defused the "Google Bomb" that has returned US President George W. Bush at the top of its results in a search ...
http://searchengineland.com/070125-230048.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Since when was calling Bush a 'miserable failure' 'offensive'?
It's fair comment. Calling him a 'wanker' might be offensive, but 'miserable failure' is 'parliamentary language'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. One guess for the new top listing for "Miserable Failure" on Google:
Yahoo! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC