Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyer: In Denying Role in Siegelman Case, Rove 'actually incriminated himself'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 12:19 PM
Original message
Lawyer: In Denying Role in Siegelman Case, Rove 'actually incriminated himself'
Although Karl Rove has repeatedly refused to testify under oath before the House Judiciary Committee about the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman, he has now sent a letter to a Republican member of the committee denying any involvement in the case.

In that letter, Rove writes, "I have never communicated, either directly or indirectly, with Justice Department or Alabama officials about the investigation, indictment, potential prosecution, prosecution, conviction, or sentencing of Governor Siegelman, or about any other matter related to his case, nor have I asked any other individual to communicate about these matters on my behalf. I have never attempted, either directly or indirectly, to influence these matters."

"Sounds like a firm denial," began MSNBC's Don Abrams in commenting on the letter. However, he immediately pointed out that "Rove did not address specifically the question of whether he contacted any non-government officials about the case -- and specifically, whether he ever spoke to his old friend Bill Canary ... an influential Republican in Alabama who just happens to be married to the US Attorney Leura Canary whose office brought the case against Siegelman."

Abrams then asked Siegelman himself about Rove's charge that he "has not offered a single piece of evidence that I played any role whatsoever in his case" and that "before giving credence to Siegelman's baseless allegations of impropriety, the committee should require Siegelman to substantiate his allegations."

Link: http://rawstory.com//news/2008/Lawyer_Republicans_gave_Rove_excuse_to_0724.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. When is he going to be brought in cuffed?:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would like to be the foreign observer
for that event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. FALSE: "...a letter to a Republican member of the committee denying any involvement in the case."
That is a patently FALSE assertion and is the very Republican Talking Point the letter was likely intended to enable. RAW STORY has been conned by Rove!!

Rove only denies a very narrow range of action!! This is not new and what he has done before, denying speaking to USA Canary, but not denying speaking to her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klyon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. If he is saying he has nothing to do with it, why won't he testify?
And how could any executive privilege apply if the White House or Rove were not involved. He makes it look like he is involved by trying to avoid answering questions. If he just appeared and lied, it seems he would be better off. This way all things point right at him and the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC