'according to a source close to the investigation that doesn't want to be identified'

[spanone]

this is what cnn calls news about ivins and the anthrax

[EFerrari]

1. Maybe Judy is working at home these days?

:shrug:

[spanone]

2. damning evidence 'according to a source......'

ms miller is lurking somewhere

[Subdivisions]

3. Surely CNN wouldn't fabricate a source...? n/t

[EFerrari]

4. The thing is, it's not just CNN. We know they aren't a news organization.

It's the WaHo and the NYTs, too.

And worse, it's the AP -- that spams everyone for a living. Look at this:

Is Another Bruce Ivins Lurking In A Biolab?
Another Bruce Ivins Could Be Lurking In Exploding Number Of Biodefense Labs

(AP) There could be another Bruce Ivins lurking somewhere in a biodefense laboratory.

These research facilities have expanded so quickly since the anthrax attacks in 2001 that the government cannot keep close tabs on the sites or their thousands of scientists. Security procedures are designed more to prevent accidents than to deal with security-cleared scientists who control their own lab.

Billions of biodefense dollars from the Bush administration swelled to nearly 1,400 the number of labs handling potential biological weapons including anthrax.

Background checks for people handing such germs and toxins are unlikely to ferret out workers with homicidal tendencies or extreme political views. There is little to stop a scientist, especially a principal investigator in charge of his own lab, from smuggling out an anthrax spore, for example, on a cotton swab used to clean his ear.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/05/ap/cabstatepent/main4323247.shtml

DID YOU GET THAT? Ivins has zero history of homicidal tendencies or extreme political views. Zero.

There is no part of the corporate media that hasn't been corrupted. :shrug: