|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:25 PM Original message |
Lazy, couch potato, cable TV zombies "tired of hearing about Obama." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GaYellowDawg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, if they're that lazy, we don't have to worry about their vote, do we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thanks Pew Research Center, for helping to push McCain's narrative! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Pew is actually fairly reliable. Again, do YOU know what questions were asked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Why don't you, since you're so upset about this thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. do you actually know what questions were asked? No? You just enjoy insulting voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I imagine they were asked if they felt they were hearing too much about the candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. you know all about that attitude, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Elitist, maybe...asshole, definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. Ha! Only negative info about Obama is shown in this TV market.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcctatas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't really see this as a bad thing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
isentropic (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. I've heard some people I know say the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freesqueeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. They're not preempting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gcomeau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
12. Ummm... good? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. This is more-making it a referendum on Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I expect it from CNN, but not from Pew Research. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
15. How ironic. People are complaining that Obama is too skinny and healthy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. Pew as in P U! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
18. i call this horseshit journalism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. Fine, then let's really, I mean REALLY focus on mclame then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
20. If they focused on McSame he would go down in the polls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC