|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:48 PM Original message |
We are liberals, but let's not be ostriches. Edwards could have f'd up 2008 and there's NO EXCUSE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dansolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Narcissist, not sociapath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I beg to differ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. snooooooooooooooooooooore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sorry, I have been told repeatedly that if you in any way notice that Edwards had an affair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm sorry. I wasn't listening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
4. Sadly, Elizabeth is partially to blame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. What could she do? I agree it's troubling, but what option did she really have? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. She had an honorable option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
31. I'm disappointed in her as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. The really really sad part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 05:38 AM Response to Reply #8 |
40. She could have talked him out of running. I admire Elizabeth and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 09:30 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. I am so glad to hear someone I know and respect say that..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. For all we knoww |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Whoa. That's going too far. These were John Edwards's actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. She KNEW about them in 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Whoa, whoa, whoa....Elizabeth is NOT to blame for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Too late, I'm already there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. You're blaming the victim. And a victim who's fighting to regain her health at that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Her choice to support his run was not being a victim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #15 |
45. some people are thrilled by the danger of what they undertake. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. True dat. I just don't want Elizabeth to be blamed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. What was she supposed to do - kill him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Choice 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Sadly, you're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. I agree that he deserves the blame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Her cancer was in remission when the choice was made to run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
50. An inconvenient truth that many people prefer to gloss over....I trusted her even more than him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConeFlower78 (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
33. Blame the victim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comrade snarky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 01:13 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. She was the victim in 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConeFlower78 (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 01:22 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. It's her choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comrade snarky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 01:45 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I'm not judging her marraige |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConeFlower78 (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 09:10 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. Yes, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 05:43 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. There are two issues here. One is between the Edwards and no one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. But they didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Would you be so forgiving if Edwards was our Dem nominee and 2008 was effectively down the tubes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. He's not our nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. But he still might affect the outcome... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #30 |
53. wow, that's a really good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. Sex has no party, but we in the Democratic Party demand a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. I felt he was being selfish when he didn't support one or the other candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
18. Liberals don't moderate each other's bedrooms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. only republican bedrooms. many "liberals" here are fucking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwolf68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
59. Its not about the bedroom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
24. He willingly almost put the Democratic party in jeopardy by running for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
51. And she knowingly participated in this mockery that I supported...what a fool I was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
27. OK I'm confused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Because as Democrats / Liberals / Progressives we aspire to be better humans than Repukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-08-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
28. He may STILL have f'ed up 2008, sadly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
57. ? I don't see that, sorry, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
36. he wasn't going to win the Nomination, it's not like he went as far as Obama or Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 02:20 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. there was a point where the race looked like it was between hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eshfemme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 06:02 AM Response to Original message |
42. I think we dodged a bullet on this one too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 06:09 AM Response to Original message |
43. This is not about personal or private failure. He dragged us all into this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
44. Has anyone got anything to say about the Edwards situation that hasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #44 |
63. No kidding! Talk about beating a dead horse. This is becoming downright tiresome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-09-08 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
47. Rubbish. Unlike Bill he wouldn't have felt the need to make nice with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Whatever JE does will be wrong in their diseased eyes. As Jesus remarked of the Pharisees, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Jesus condemned adultery, and he would condemn John Edwards for this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. "Judge not, that ye be not judged, for with what measure ye judge ye shall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Again, you've misinterpreted Jesus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Well, there's none so blind as those that will not see, so I won't be spending much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
56. Ehhh - honestly, itr's his private business. And he was in no way close to getting the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datasuspect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. faux outrage must increase site traffic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsTryska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-10-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
60. Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda, but Didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC