Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think the Edward's affair speaks volumes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 05:34 PM
Original message
I think the Edward's affair speaks volumes
Every time a repuke gets busted having some sort of an affair (it seems to happen once a week), it quickly gets swept under the carpet and the pukes don't mention it. When it is a Dem, it is a big story and there is a lot of discussion.

Sure, some people here think it isn't worth talking about, but others here are calling Edwards out. It's interesting to see how Democrats demand some integrity of there leaders and the pukes turn a blind eye to their parties indiscretions.

I'm not judging John Edwards at all on what he has done, but I think this is a perfect example on how the left leaning Americans really think about who they support as their leaders and how the right leaning dipshits don't give a shit about their leaders, as long as they win the game.

Just a quick thought. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't get this....
Yes Edwards did cheat. But what happened was between consenting adults which makes this none of our business. I am also ok with the affairs on the pukes side as long as it is between consenting adults. The problem with their party is that their holier than thou attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't care about anyone's sex life either
But here is how it works...

Many people still believe that cheating on a spouse is a sign that you are not trustworthy and lying about it doesn't help.

John Edwards was running for president as a Democrat and there was certainly a possibility that he could have gotten the ticket. Knowing that he had an affair and the discovery of such could easily be used to hurt his chances of getting enough support, he ran for the position anyway. Many people look at that as a threat to their chances of having a Democrat in the Whitehouse.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Coulnd't have said it better myself. He jeopardized the Dem's chances for the WH. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe, maybe not.....
JFK and Bill Clinton managed. As a party we need to get over this sexual stigma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. So now if Obama doesn't beat McCain, you all are going to blame it on Edwards?
Nice to have a scapegoat just in case. Wait, I thought the scapegoat was Hillary. :shrug: This affair only jeopardizes Obama chances IF WE LET IT. Let the corprat media whores keep yammering on about it and you all keep it up as well. Eat our own!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Huh?
This doesn't jeopardize Obama's chances at all. What are you on about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Using your logic, then Giuliani's infidelity should project onto McCain and the Republicans.
But, as we know, the media gerbils don't look at it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No
Read what I said again. This affair has nothing to do with the election as it stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-09-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. the outrage should have been over his co-sponsorship of IWR n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC