Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Ron Paul a Bad man?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 08:56 PM
Original message
Is Ron Paul a Bad man?
Really, ...i'm asking if anyone can say for sure. I just met someone tonight who is a fan of his and seemed to really fancy Libertarian ideas too. She seemed like a progressive person and i wonder if that's irreconcilable. I tried to tell her that i thought Ron Paul and his supporters are whack-a-doodles and that Libertarianism is a fantasy wrapped in a deluded riddle, but she wasn't having it.

Anyone got any good links to forward?


C'mon DU, let me see you shine...


:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I dunno, but I'd probably take a Libertarian over a Bush/Cheney neocon
The libertarian might kill you with neglect but the neocon will just kill you outright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
17.  Libertarians are worse than anything we've seen yet. everything will be privatized & deregulated
no public schools, all services like fire houses will ne subscription.. all highways will be toll roads, the classes will stratify and you will soon see the biggest Fascist cluster fuck in the history of the world

and the Bortz loonies will immediately take over..

paul writes a good essay.. but he isn't what he pretends to be.. it is an act to dupe people like you who are looking for an alternative to the system.. better just change the system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I consider him a racist kook.
He never impressed me as an inclusional public servant.

He isn't much good on his feet in debate, judging from the outcome of the GOP debates staged earlier this year.

He is attracting a fierce but statistically insignificant percentage of fans on some college campus, but by a huge differential is going to be buried alive under the Obama victory in November.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I do thank him for any McCain votes he pulls away :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agree. He may serve as a useful prop in McCain's demise at the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. he won't be on the ballot, will he?
Though maybe he could be an Independence Party candidate, or some such madness....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I was thinking write-ins. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I know a lot of Texas Republicans who plan to write him in.
I don't know any Texans who like McCain, though I assume most will hold their nose and vote for him. Still, I imagine quite a few will vote for Barr or Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. he had a newsletter
that apparently involved some racist ranting. But he claims no knowledge of what was written and by whom. He's from Texas, though i can't in my heart fault someone on where they're from... i've had quite enough of Texans lately.
...Though i guess dubya's really from CT.

:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Yep. I understand why Dubya might have wanted as far away from
Poppy and Babs as he could get, but the fake cowboy thing just doesn't work.

I'll go to Larry McMurtry on Texas. Never saw anybody write about a place with more know-how and insight and respect than how McMurtry does on Texas.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's little point in talking to Glinbertarians.... Easier to wait for their house to catch fire..
at which point they'll come around to the good points of having a government astonishingly quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I like his foreign policy a lot (Non-intervention, no nation building, etc)
But his domestic and economic policy is absolutely atrocious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. anyone got links? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's slightly better than a broken clock.
Edited on Sun Aug-17-08 09:27 PM by Lisa0825
I'm in his district. I have emailed him on a few issues in the past couple years, and he has responded quickly and personally (as in not a form letter). As a Libertarian who only wears the Republican Label because it's Texas, he's not afraid to speak out against Republican policies like the war, the foreign ports deal etc. His speech Neo-Conned is terrific! However, as a Libertarian, he's also chock full of crazy, such as wanting to do away with public education. He's known as Dr No because he votes against anything and everything that is tax-funded.

OH, BTW, the one thing he is NOT Libertarian on is choice.... he is stridently anti-abortion.

Here he is at On The Issues: http://www.ontheissues.org/TX/Ron_Paul.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. was ob/gyn his medical specialty? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. He started out as internal medicine, and switched to OB/GYN.
Still, most physicians I know are pro-choice, and most Libertarians I know are pro-choice... just not him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. There are libertarians and there are Libertarians. Paul is a Libertarian
Small "l" libertarians are very strongly in favor of personal, individual liberties with the one limitation that the liberties of one individual cannot limit or otherwise impinge on the liberties of other individuals. In general, libertarians oppose drug laws and institutional discrimination and support equal rights for all and a barter based economy.

Large "L" Libertarians endorse the philosophy that "might makes right" and that the people best qualified to be in charge are those who can keep and hold power. As such, they are very strongly in favor of corporate liberties with no limitations. In general, Libertarians support unregulated laissez-faire capitalism and oppose any measures of any kind which place limits on what corporations can and cannot do.

In addition are what I have heard described as "federalist libertarians." These are people who hold that the 10th Amendment prohibits laws and court interpretations which interfere with their perceived right to enslave women, murder gays, lynch "uppity" blacks and round up the Jews and slaughter them. When you hear the phrase "states rights," it is almost certain that it is being spoken by a sexist, homophobic, racist and/or anti-Semitic federalist libertarian.

When you look at Ron Paul's record in the House, with his campaign literature and with the groups working to get him elected, it is very clear that he is a Libertarian with federalist libertarian leanings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. clearer now...
Edited on Mon Aug-18-08 06:02 AM by druidity33
i tried Wiki for a solid description of "libertarian", but it was awful damn confusing. Apparently even (l)ibertarians disagree on who and what they are. You're description is much clearer. Thanks.


:shrug:

go figure...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, that deregulation worked really well for the banking industry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
20. Libertarianism is what happens when you don't reality-check your policies.
Libertarians have taken a sensible-sounding idea: "personal freedom is good", and developed it into an entire detailed political philosophy; checking their ideas only against that initial principle rather than against the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. thank you
that is an excellent distillation of how i feel about Libertarianism. I wasn't able to say it quite so clearly however. I know Ayn Rand gives me headaches.

I remember responding to this person, "but i'm a pragmatist and realist, i can't buy into that". I even remember calling her an "idealist" and saying it with some derision. I must be getting old.

She told me she switched Party affiliations along with a group of others and they managed to get one of theirs seated at the convention...

:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. a nutbar, but at least in this race he can play the role of useful idiot
forward your friend some quotes from the now-infamous "Ron Paul Race Report"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. I wouldn't piss on Ron Paul if he were on fire.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanctified Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. I agree with Ron on several issues. Mainly end the war in Iraq right now and Legalization of drugs.
Other than that he is not really the candidate for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. yes, he is
because he believes that women are second-class citizens that do not deserve the Constitutional right to privacy.

he makes me sick :puke:

he makes me angry :mad:

yes, he is a bad man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Oh yes, he is a VERY bad man
Edited on Mon Aug-18-08 07:06 PM by Naturyl
And American-style "libertarianism" is a VERY bad idea.

Dismantling the entire government is not a "progressive" idea. You're right that it's irreconcilable with progressive values and don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

See my journal for some more information on "libertarianism" and why it's even more dangerous than neo-conservatism.

Sam Sarrha put it better than I can:

no public schools, all services like fire houses will ne subscription.. all highways will be toll roads, the classes will stratify and you will soon see the biggest Fascist cluster fuck in the history of the world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC