Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Leuren Moret, an environmental scientist, scares the crap out of me"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 11:57 AM
Original message
"Leuren Moret, an environmental scientist, scares the crap out of me"

http://www.feministpeacenetwork.org/2008/08/18/leuren-moret-on-the-far-reaching-harms-of-uranium-and-radiation/


Leuren Moret On The Far-Reaching Harms Of Uranium and Radiation


Leuren Moret, an environmental scientist, scares the crap out of me in a way that I haven’t felt since I read Nevil Shute’s On The Beach–and that was fiction, this is not. Why– because I believe that she is entirely correct in her understanding of the toxic impact of uranium and radioactive contamination. In a new article published in Namaste Magazine entitled Populations Exposed To Environmental Uranium: Increased Risk of Infertility and Reproductive Cancers, Moret talks about the “increased risk of infertility and reproductive cancers” as well as the likely connection between uranium and diabetes and autism. Moret’s article tackles numerous aspects of the impact of uranium on human health and is a landmark effort to connect some dots that definitely need to be connected. Here are some of the astounding issues that Moret examines:

“It was a surprise to discover that Livermore Nuclear weapons Lab has not only secretly conducted extensive global monitoring of ionizing radiation for decades, but local ionizing radiation monitoring as well. In fact, I saw fresh core samples from Hiroshima and Nagasaki lying on a table in a Livermore environmental laboratory in 1991. When I asked Dr. Kai Wong, a Livermore lab ionizing radiation expert, why they were still monitoring Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he said:

“Because Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still radioactive. And we are still studying the people because they are too.””

-snip-



High-risk counties within 100 miles of nuclear reactors where 2/3 of breast cancer deaths occurred 1985-1989

“When the results of mud samples from the Marin County bay side shoreline and the Pacific coastline are analyzed and reported, low-level ionizing radiation from the Sierras will be identified as the cause of what may be the highest breast cancer incidence in the United States.
-snip-
-----------------------------


men's stupidy, greed and power grabbing have given women breast cancer and will continue to give women breast cancer until all the hot areas are behind yellow crime scene/HAZMAT tape.


however, men say they love us.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Men?
All men did this? I don't remember doing this...Do all men love women?

Nice generalizations, there... but an interesting read nonetheless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. men invented the nuke bombs, used the bombs, didn't clean up


Congress is more men then women. men voted to do all this. and today men keep promoting nukes.

men used DU on purpose in Iraq. slow genocide.

show me where women had a hand in any of this.

its our breasts that have been and are still being misused by men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. show me where women had a hand in any of this??
well, there is that Condoleeza person...

but you might want to research Marie Curie and Lise Meitner and Leona Woods Marshall Libby, who helped build the atomic bomb...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ummm...
http://www.temple.edu/tempress/titles/1222_reg.html

The public perception of the making of the atomic bomb is yet an image of the dramatic efforts of a few brilliant male scientists. However, the Manhattan Project was not just the work of a few and it was not just in Los Alamos. It was, in fact, a sprawling research and industrial enterprise that spanned the country from Hanford in Washington State to Oak Ridge in Tennessee, and the Met labs in Illinois.

The Manhattan Project also included women in every capacity. During World War II the manpower shortages opened the laboratory doors to women and they embraced the opportunity to demonstrate that they, too, could do "creative science." Although women participated in all aspects of the Manhattan Project, their contributions are either omitted or only mentioned briefly in most histories of the project. It is this hidden story that is presented in Their Day in the Sun through interviews, written records, and photographs of the women who were physicists, chemists, mathematicians, biologists, and technicians in the labs.

Authors Ruth H. Howes and Caroline L. Herzenberg have uncovered accounts of the scientific problems the women helped solve as well as the opportunities and discrimination they faced. Their Day in the Sun describes their abrupt recruitment for the war effort and includes anecdotes about everyday life in these clandestine improvised communities. A chapter about what happened to the women after the war and about their attitudes now, so many years later, toward the work they did on the bomb is included.


Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. So you're saying women aren't any good at nuclear physics?
Sounds sexist to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hate leads to this. Any hate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. ROFLMAO At Your Closing Paragraph!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. We're irradiating you in a secret desire to fulfill Hentai fantasies
Are you fucking kidding me? Seriously? Your response to the epidemic of breast cancer amounts to "It's men's fault!"? Because you apparently believe there are no women in the business of nuclear physics, and no women on the city councils, state and federal legislatures that vote to have mining done, plants built, troops sent?

My solution to you is to not get pregnant. There's a 50/50 chance you'll have a boy, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not just breast cancer - all organs at risk -- just watch the increase in pancreatic cancer
supposedly (formerly) rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveG Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. correlation, not causation
If you check that map with a similar population density map of the US, you will see that the concentrations of Brest Cancer are also the most populated places in the Country with about 2/3rds of the population. Couple that with the fact that the most populated parts of the country have taken the brunt of a couple of hundred years of industrial waste being poured into the air and water, and dumped in landfills. Yes this is also were the most Reactors are. There may be a correlation, but you haven't shown causation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC