Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the worst televised sports coverage in the history of mankind

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:37 AM
Original message
the worst televised sports coverage in the history of mankind
I can safely say that NBC's coverage of the Men's volleyball Gold Mwdal Match was truly one of the most blasphemous events ever covered. Not only was the match between the USA and Brasil delayed by 18 hours, but it was also shortened. Could you ever imagine a Superbowl or College Championship shortenedby nearly half? ANY gold medal match featuring US participants should be broadcast live, in full in this country. Canada and the UK showed this match live. Why couldn't NBC? Our men deserved to at least have their match shown in full. Shame on NBC for exploiting the tragedy of these games for their own marketing purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, it was lamented at my house as well.
We were reduced to following it on the internet as a fucking ping-pong match was shown instead. Disgusting. No point in watching the replay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think the entire Olympic coverage by NBC was really quite bad...
They seemed like a marketing tool for AWOL chimpy and for China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bravo. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. One reason is Money
NBC paid for the rights to the Olympics so they could make money. The way you make money is to air the most popular segment in prime time. Prime time advertising rates are worth millions, compared to advertising dollars during the wee hour of the morning. So in the end money won out. That, incidentally, is also why the match was shortened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. if that's the case
why not show the mens bball final instead? God I hope ESPN wins the rights for the Chicago games, as they have already comitted to showing EVERY event live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's a good point too, Crimson
They did show the Men BB final at 230Am, I forgot about that. I suppose they figured the backlash would not have been worth the monetary gains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Since when is 1AM prime-time?
Making the west coast stay up to 1AM to watch a taped event made no sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I have no clue pokerfan
That doesn't make since to me. Must have had something to do with the local syndicate of NBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. I thought NBC's coverage was mildly bad ....
Worst in history ? .... big words ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gi4obama Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. You can also put
Olympic baseball coverage on that list. The Japan/USA game went into extra innings the other day and the new rule to help shorten the games was used.


*The rule says that if a game were to go into extra innings that 2 players would be placed on first and second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I saw that and just shook my head
I am no huge fan of baseball but there is something sacrosanct about it. You just don't make rule changes like this, it fundamentally changes the game. Hell, I think the DH rule ruined the modern game, at least in the AL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The only time that the extra inning rule makes sense
is for the All Star game. For that game, it would ensure that the game ends, and help prevent another tie and keep from exhausting the bullpen. Or, they could just get rid of the "It Counts" BS, and let the winningest team host the WS like it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. a lot of non-USA origin sports
have overtime rules unlike the rest of the game. So if you watch international sports it wasn't that huge a surprise. As the writer below wrote, the American game could probably use this rule for events like the All Star game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I liked the coverage
It was basically the same coverage you always get from an Olympics that many time zones away.

Funny enough NFL network cuts a lot of the dead time from their games when they rebroadcast them. Boy it's a lot easier to watch. So cutting out the duller parts of championship games that are not live... not new either to the Olympics or sports and certainly expected when you have so many events to show and only a small idea exactly what events will be attractive to viewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Olympics are not sports
At least according to NBC.

From NBC: "The audience makeup of the Olympics is very much like that of American Idol and Dancing with the Stars which have 'live' season finales presented in much the same way."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. One more reason I hope ESPN gets the 2016 games
they will treat the Olympics like the sporting event it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Can you imagine NBC broadcasting the Super Bowl?
Or the World Series? And delaying it three hours for the west coast? Don't think that they wouldn't do it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. How many people bet on the outcome of a volleyball match?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Have you ever been inside a Vegas sports book?
People bet on everything, including American Idol. Are you saying that the only reason people have an interest in watching live coverage of a sporting event is because of gambling?

The reason people want to to watch live sports is that it is unscripted drama. Delaying the gold medal match by 21 hours (left coast) in this twenty-first century "information age" was simply idiotic. It was impossible not to be spoiled.

NBC had over a dozen channels covering the games. Why didn't they make the gold medal match available live on one of the lesser channels AND also air it delayed in prime-time? I doubt that it would have hurt their Sunday night ratings a bit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Have you ever been inside this tunnel?
Well, have you?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. I enjoyed the Olympics.

Of course more unedited sports and less commercials would have been nice, but thats tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. NBC's coverage sucked all the way around
I was actually a bit hopeful when they kept mentioning how they would be putting all their cable channels to use. They did, but not all at the same time, and most hardly at all. On NBC we were treated to the most "popular" sports, the swimming, beach volleyball, gymnastics, etc., their standard fare on NBC.

The trouble is, the only other channel that broadcast at nights showed boxing, boxing and more boxing on UHD channel. Once every few days they would throw on some badminton early in the evening, but only for a short while, then back to boxing.

The daytime schedule would sometimes feature odd sports, but I saw no cycling, little soccer, little basketball(no women's), the list goes on and on. It really was atrocious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC