Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tin foil time...Are the Republicans trying to create an incident with Russia before the election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:13 PM
Original message
Tin foil time...Are the Republicans trying to create an incident with Russia before the election?
Reading the news, the polls, and listening to the various talking heads, I am convinced that the Republicans believe the best way to stay in power is to play to their perceived "strength" in foreign affairs. I absolutely would not put it past the GOP to cause an incident that "only McCain can fix" before the election in a last ditch effort to secure another four years.

I find it a sad statement that I now believe one of the two major political parties is capable of this kind of gross act, but the last 8 years have taught me to expect anything and everything from the republicans. I will say my BS meter will be off the charts if there is a sudden marked increase in tension with Russia in the month before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. you have to ask?
I would say that it's a possibility, given our long-standing assumption that Pugs will play the fear card in order to steal the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wouldnt It Be Ironic
If they were doing this, and Russia really did get pissed, and launched real nukes at us?

:grr: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. One of Putin's advisors has already called out Cheney on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Expect it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is my biggest fear right now.
It certainly looks like all the pieces are falling into place. Call me a tinfoiler if you wish... but I wouldn't put anything past the neo-con-artists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. part of the "Regan Revival" aspect of the McCain sales job
The return of "the evil empire" to replace the "axis of evil"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. A co-worker of mine, a jingiostic libertarian, has been hoping for a new cold war
He feels we need a concrete enemy to ensure that the US unites and accepts stronger security guidelines. He has been increasingly giddy coming into work these past 2 weeks and keeps saying, "It's going to happen! It's going to happen!"

He's not high on my list of likable coworkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. OK, that is just vile
:puke: You have my sympathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The only thing I get along with him on is he hates McCain almost as much as I do
The difference is he believes McCain's not strong enough to run this country as a virtual dictatorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why would a libertarian want "stronger security guidelines"? n/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He's a flake.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 01:32 PM by Godhumor
He wants no government except he supports a military state, which is why I went with jingoistic libertarian. Frankly, I think he's a fascist, but he calls himself a libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. funny because those two are almost polar opposites
unless he means a military state controlled by a private army of corporations....lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Actually, I think the situation with Russia is a result of * incompetence.
Yes, I think the Rethugs wanted an October surprise but I don't think that this is what they had in mind.

As far as I can tell, this situation with Russia and Georgia is a result of total and complete incompetence on the part of bush, cheney, and rice. They appear to have encouraged Georgia to taunt Russia without realizing that Russia would respond with force. Now they've triggered a potential disaster in eastern Europe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. You can't have martial law without an incident, silly! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, if they had succeeded already, they wouldn't have to keep trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. No tin foil hat needed by you but a dunce cap IS needed by those that don't get that!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
12string Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. incident
I have the feeling they don't intend to have an election at all.An incident with Russia could be the reason they need to invoke P.D.51.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't see anything tin foil about it.
And the Russians are falling for it, hook, line and sinker.

It is possible that the Georgia affair is a cover for plans for Iran. Now that's tin foil, but that the Bush administration is trying to distract from the economy by stirring the pot in Georgia/Ossetia/Russia? No question.

Ossetia separated in 1991-92. Russia has apparently been in there "keeping the peace" (?) since then or at least not just recently. A series of GOPers from Rove to Rice to Cheney's aides have visited in the past couple of months. And then Georgia bombs Ossetia. The German newspapers reported that Georgia attacked first (this time around). They need a real peacekeeping force, not containing Russians, in Ossetia, but beyond that, after 16-17 years, seems Ossetia has pretty well established its independence. Georgians in Ossetia need protection, and the deal is done.

I think that the Europeans are getting involved in this in a positive way, so I think that the excitement will soon be over and the dispute resolved at least for the moment until the election. If not, then the Russians are big fools. They should simply leave Ossetia and put a mixture of peacekeepers from neutral countries in there to protect the Georgians in Ossetia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. They're on their own 2 with time for only one more play
Might as well launch a Hail Mary and hope for a "touchdown." It's not like they're facing anything other than lottery odds of getting hit by the fallout of the murderous war they're hoping to launch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. No.
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 02:59 PM by Odin2005
If it was a Democratic administration dong this I would have absolutely no problem with our actions so for. The main thing that ticks me off is the hypocrisy of the Bushies.

To assume that this is all a neo-con scheme is stupidly Americo-centric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ordinary people in Europe think so n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. Entering into yet ANOTHER conflict is hardly a show of strength
Especially if it puts American forces staring down Russian forces with guns drawn.

This could end very badly, and both Rice and Putin know it. Ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC