Godhumor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:13 PM
Original message |
Tin foil time...Are the Republicans trying to create an incident with Russia before the election? |
|
Reading the news, the polls, and listening to the various talking heads, I am convinced that the Republicans believe the best way to stay in power is to play to their perceived "strength" in foreign affairs. I absolutely would not put it past the GOP to cause an incident that "only McCain can fix" before the election in a last ditch effort to secure another four years.
I find it a sad statement that I now believe one of the two major political parties is capable of this kind of gross act, but the last 8 years have taught me to expect anything and everything from the republicans. I will say my BS meter will be off the charts if there is a sudden marked increase in tension with Russia in the month before the election.
|
grasswire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I would say that it's a possibility, given our long-standing assumption that Pugs will play the fear card in order to steal the election.
|
Parche
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If they were doing this, and Russia really did get pissed, and launched real nukes at us?
:grr: :hi:
|
beac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. One of Putin's advisors has already called out Cheney on |
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
MadrasT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
5. This is my biggest fear right now. |
|
It certainly looks like all the pieces are falling into place. Call me a tinfoiler if you wish... but I wouldn't put anything past the neo-con-artists.
|
Prefer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
6. part of the "Regan Revival" aspect of the McCain sales job |
|
The return of "the evil empire" to replace the "axis of evil"
|
Godhumor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. A co-worker of mine, a jingiostic libertarian, has been hoping for a new cold war |
|
He feels we need a concrete enemy to ensure that the US unites and accepts stronger security guidelines. He has been increasingly giddy coming into work these past 2 weeks and keeps saying, "It's going to happen! It's going to happen!"
He's not high on my list of likable coworkers.
|
MadrasT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
:puke: You have my sympathy.
|
Godhumor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. The only thing I get along with him on is he hates McCain almost as much as I do |
|
The difference is he believes McCain's not strong enough to run this country as a virtual dictatorship.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Why would a libertarian want "stronger security guidelines"? n/ |
Godhumor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 01:32 PM by Godhumor
He wants no government except he supports a military state, which is why I went with jingoistic libertarian. Frankly, I think he's a fascist, but he calls himself a libertarian.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. funny because those two are almost polar opposites |
|
unless he means a military state controlled by a private army of corporations....lol
|
yardwork
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Actually, I think the situation with Russia is a result of * incompetence. |
|
Yes, I think the Rethugs wanted an October surprise but I don't think that this is what they had in mind.
As far as I can tell, this situation with Russia and Georgia is a result of total and complete incompetence on the part of bush, cheney, and rice. They appear to have encouraged Georgia to taunt Russia without realizing that Russia would respond with force. Now they've triggered a potential disaster in eastern Europe.
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
13. You can't have martial law without an incident, silly! nt |
no_hypocrisy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Well, if they had succeeded already, they wouldn't have to keep trying. |
Breeze54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
15. No tin foil hat needed by you but a dunce cap IS needed by those that don't get that! |
12string
(443 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I have the feeling they don't intend to have an election at all.An incident with Russia could be the reason they need to invoke P.D.51.
|
JDPriestly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I don't see anything tin foil about it. |
|
And the Russians are falling for it, hook, line and sinker.
It is possible that the Georgia affair is a cover for plans for Iran. Now that's tin foil, but that the Bush administration is trying to distract from the economy by stirring the pot in Georgia/Ossetia/Russia? No question.
Ossetia separated in 1991-92. Russia has apparently been in there "keeping the peace" (?) since then or at least not just recently. A series of GOPers from Rove to Rice to Cheney's aides have visited in the past couple of months. And then Georgia bombs Ossetia. The German newspapers reported that Georgia attacked first (this time around). They need a real peacekeeping force, not containing Russians, in Ossetia, but beyond that, after 16-17 years, seems Ossetia has pretty well established its independence. Georgians in Ossetia need protection, and the deal is done.
I think that the Europeans are getting involved in this in a positive way, so I think that the excitement will soon be over and the dispute resolved at least for the moment until the election. If not, then the Russians are big fools. They should simply leave Ossetia and put a mixture of peacekeepers from neutral countries in there to protect the Georgians in Ossetia.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
19. They're on their own 2 with time for only one more play |
|
Might as well launch a Hail Mary and hope for a "touchdown." It's not like they're facing anything other than lottery odds of getting hit by the fallout of the murderous war they're hoping to launch.
|
Odin2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-27-08 02:59 PM by Odin2005
If it was a Democratic administration dong this I would have absolutely no problem with our actions so for. The main thing that ticks me off is the hypocrisy of the Bushies.
To assume that this is all a neo-con scheme is stupidly Americo-centric.
|
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Ordinary people in Europe think so n/t |
DFW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-27-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Entering into yet ANOTHER conflict is hardly a show of strength |
|
Especially if it puts American forces staring down Russian forces with guns drawn.
This could end very badly, and both Rice and Putin know it. Ain't gonna happen.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message |