Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Allows No Delay of Miers's Testimony About Fired Prosecutors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:15 PM
Original message
Judge Allows No Delay of Miers's Testimony About Fired Prosecutors
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/26/AR2008082603331.html

Judge Allows No Delay of Miers's Testimony About Fired Prosecutors

Harriet Miers, former White House counsel, could be compelled to appear before the House Judiciary Committee as early as next month.
Harriet Miers, former White House counsel, could be compelled to appear before the House Judiciary Committee as early as next month. (By Dennis Cook -- Associated Press)

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 27, 2008; Page A11

A federal judge yesterday refused to delay his order requiring former White House counsel Harriet E. Miers to testify in Congress, another legal setback for the Bush administration's attempts to limit cooperation with Democratic lawmakers.

U.S. District Judge John D. Bates rejected the administration's argument that Miers should not be required to cooperate with Congress while the government appeals an earlier ruling he issued.

In the previous decision, Bates rejected the administration's assertions that Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten were protected by executive privilege and could not be forced to testify or provide documents to Congress about the controversial firings of nine U.S. attorneys in 2006. The judge said that the government's position was excessively broad and that senior aides must be more specific about the information they say is protected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Next month" could be as early as six days from now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Will Dems in Congress force Meirs & Bolten to appear?
If so, will they demand that they be Under Oath?

I doubt that this will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Could a democrat sue under a writ of mandamus to compel the Judiciary Committee
to issue one more subpoena with arrests if Miers and Bolton are held in contempt?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandamus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Don't count on Reid demanding anything from Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. If it does, expect them to sit there and plead the Fifth Amendment
to every question, even their names.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good start
So they now take it to the DC Circuit, and then we see exactly how great is the Nixon legacy.

Pass the popcorn.....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. i like it. wait til the judge finds the horsehead in his bed.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. how many toes of independent minded people will Mukasey step upon?
as he tells the Judiciary that some people (Repigs) are not accountable in his Justice Dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Too bad Congress is on vacation....
I suppose they could come back for a special hearing but the Repubs would be sure to make trouble. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. She will take the 5th and refuse to speak. You heard it here first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC