Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans are such hypocrites! McCain is "an adulterer"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:26 PM
Original message
Republicans are such hypocrites! McCain is "an adulterer"
I remember many pious Rethugs back in the 90's saying, "an adulterer is not fit for the White House." I used to think, I wonder what history book they are reading? Regardless of the "family values" meme or the morality of this, how hypocritical to ignore this when it is in your perceived best interest.

Also, today, on the Radio I heard the Republicans complaining/attacking Obama's backdrop for tonight's speech EVEN THOUGH in 2004 * himself used a similar backdrop!

What hypocrites!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. A 527 should put together a video montage of repub pontifications from the '90s
and fade to a picture of McCain at the end.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. An excellent idea! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. They impeached a President for having extra-marital sex.
Now they've nominated one. Nothing hypocritical with Republican logic. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But his wife was sick and not pretty anymore!
And besides, the new girl was rich! And he married her so it's okay now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ah the rationalization and the justification of the GOP. Pathetic.
Don't ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:44 PM
Original message
And I heard a rumor McCain was a POW!
POW = Permission to Oust Wife
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'd be happy to have a debate on John McCain's POW status...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. McCain-like dupe
Edited on Thu Aug-28-08 01:45 PM by beac
POW POW POW POW POW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. But it's different when it pertains to them and suits their purpose
just like the "family values" of Poppy * eh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Worse than an adulterer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Reagan was involved with Nancy while still married to...
Jane Wyman. Their first issue... forget if it was Ron Jr. or Patti... came along 6 mos after the wedding.

Reagan was an adulterer too. They make up these rules as they go along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hmm. That figures. They do make it up as they go along. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. and a liar was not fit for the White House
and yet, they wholeheartedly supported on starting 1/20/2001 ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh yeah, that's right...they did say that too. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC