They float these ideas in their echo chambers, until it seems like a self evident fact that the surge worked, or that Iraq is a dangerous nation that needs to be toppled, or that a stimulus package will jump start the economy, or any of the other pack of lies that represents the McBush plan. On this one:
It is now widely considered beyond dispute that Bush has won his gamble. The surge is a terrific success. Choose your metric: attacks on American soldiers, car bombs, civilian deaths, potholes. They're all down, down, down. Lattes sold by street vendors are up. Performances of Shakespeare by local repertory companies have tripled. Skepticism seems like sour grapes. If you opposed the surge, you have two choices. One is to admit that you were wrong, wrong, wrong. The other is to sound as if you resent all the good news and remain eager for disaster. Too many opponents of the war have chosen option No. 2.
But we needn't quarrel about all this, or deny the reality of the good news, to say that the surge has not worked yet. The test is simple, and built into the concept of a surge: Has it allowed us to reduce troop levels to below where they were when it started? The answer is no.
"No, the surge is not a success."
http://www.slate.com/id/2184890/Not to mention many other factors like ethnic cleansing had largely been completed. My pet goat is a better military strategist than the Dufus in Chief. Also, what does it mean when someone deliberately runs you over and then helps you up? Do you credit them with running you over, or helping you up?