Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Too Close for Comfort? (McShame and the Renzi scandal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:02 AM
Original message
Too Close for Comfort? (McShame and the Renzi scandal)
http://www.washingtonindependent.com/4834/mccain-dodged-bullet

SIERRA VISTA, Ariz.–Did Sen. John McCain, the GOP presidential nominee dodge a bullet when Rep. Rick Renzi, (R-Ariz.) was indicted in February on charges of wire fraud, money laundering, extortion and conspiracy in connection with the misuse of campaign funds and the sale of a business associate’s land?

The 35-count indictment against the three-term congressman did not include charges during a crucial time period in 2003, when Renzi was working with McCain to move a controversial amendment through Congress. They were trying to keep Fort Huachuca, a large Army base in southeast Arizona, from closing.

If prosecutors had focused on Renzi’s submission of what might be false congressional financial disclosure statements, then McCain might have been drawn deeper into the Renzi case. The FBI has already interviewed at least one member of McCain’s Senate staff and requested that his Senate office turn over documents possibly related to the case.

(snip)

The Renzi case, according to watchdog groups, has been impeded by political interference. Former Arizona U.S. Atty. Paul Charlton was pressing for the Renzi investigation in the fall of 2006. He was fired Dec. 7, 2006, a month after Renzi won reelection to his third term. Charlton was one of eight U.S. attorneys fired by former U.S. Atty. Gen. Alberto Gonzales. The dismissals led to congressional investigations that eventually forced Gonzales’ resignation. Charlton declined to comment about the Renzi case and his firing.

(snip)

McCain appeared unfazed by news of Renzi’s indictment and the 16-month criminal investigation that led up to it. When the indictment was unsealed Feb.22, Renzi was listed as one of 24 co-campaign chairmen for McCain’s Arizona presidential campaign, though the FBI’s criminal probe had been known since October 2006.

When asked by reporters four days after the indictment was made public whether Renzi was still on his campaign team, McCain said, “I don’t think so. It doesn’t matter.” Two months after Renzi’s indictment, McCain told a reporter that Renzi was a “good friend” and that the two “have a good relationship.”

(end snips)

Now, there's lipstick on a pig.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is this what we're all supposed to be dancing over?...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't think so, unless they're gonna indict McShame too.
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 09:15 AM by deminks
Now that would be worth dancing about.

So far, McShame has skated on this one, much like the Keating deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But it says the FBI has interviewed a McPOW staffer.
and asked them to turn over documents. Maybe the staffer rolled. The OP alluded to "interviews" being done in the clues. I feel like I'm playing some kids' game or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. That is why I posted this. It does seem possible.
With the background of the Keating mess, McShame would be in a fine "pickle."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. I HOPE this is it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I hope it isn't... I don't think this will do alot of damage.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not unless a McPOW staffer cut a deal and rolled on him...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. It might do damage if McShame is indicted.
I don't think he could run for pretzeldente replacement if he is indicted. Maybe legally, but not morally. As if morals existed in that party any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. The buzzards are circling John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oopsie, looks like McPOW covered for somebody!...
how mavericky of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC