Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Heavily edited Palin/Gibson interview

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:51 PM
Original message
Heavily edited Palin/Gibson interview
What the fuck is up with that? I counted maybe a half dozen obvious edits in the interview...which was what..five to seven minutes long? There were more jump cuts in this interview than a French arthouse film!!!

What did she say that was soooooooooo embarrassingly uninformed that ABC felt the need to cut it out of the aired version?

Not to mention her not having a clue...deer in the headlights look in her eyes...about what the Bush Doctrine was?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh please let there be a mole at ABC like there was at CBS re Couric/McCain
Maybe we'll see that outtake footage yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This sounds like a job for Harry Shearer.
He has people who feed him goodies like this all the time, and he posts it on his website.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Love "Le Show"! Hello, Harry, can you get somebody on that ASAP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I'm thinking of a Linda McCartney moment.
Hello, sound-board guy. Direct feed, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. At least Linda never claimed that she could step in...
...and take over Wings if Paul died.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think they're supposed to show the whole thing tomorrow night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I just gotta say
I love that sig! I get irritated with all of the doom and gloom postings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. This interview is worthless in my mind
Let's see her live and in real time. They don't really expect people to buy a product without at least seeing it work. Would you buy a car without a test drive? Would you buy a house from watching a video?
How insulting can this republic party get. If they knew what shame was they'd be filled with it. As it is they're full of something else and tons of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I guess it wasn't as easy as those beauty contestant questions
She looked shellshocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. .What did they cut out, I wonder.
What did she say that they didn't want us to hear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. What the Hades was THAT?!1 Edits and cut-aways, tons of them!1
Besides doing this on a regular newscast, only MINUTES spread out over days. This is NO way to get a sense of who the person is or what they know. But in her case, when she didn't know, she just kept blabbering. And then it was the ol' Shirley TEMPLE sock-the-fist, smile, and say I-believe-in-the'murican-WAY!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoRabbit Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. She's long-winded
I got the distinct impression, through the HORRIBLE editing, that somehow the whole interview was rushed, and she was being incredibly long-winded in her answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The longer she blabbers, the less time to ask more questions. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColoradoMagician Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Used a teleprompter at the airport
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 06:26 PM by ColoradoMagician
They were talking, on the radio, how she addressed the airport audience while reading from a teleprompter.

Huh?

I had a history teacher do that in high school. He was the school's football coach and his lecture was just to read to us from the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Was there Vaseline on the lens?
I had visions of a Baba Wawa lighting plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. well according to the freepers
they edited out all of her articulate, coherent and cogent answers. They are writing to complain to ABC about the unfair editing.

I think everybody here should *also* write and complain about the editing. Demand to see Failin' long, uncut.

Seriously, they think abc cut out her good parts. Bwah!ha!ha!ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BronxBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Please tell me you're not serious. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. LOL. Yes sure, they think her hand-picked guy was trying to hide her genius.
Yes, let us ALL see the unedited version. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. In Nightline's version of interview they have fixed all the jumping tape
etc. that were so evident as being edits in the first viewing we had earlier. We saw the same parts of the interview over again, but this time it was smooth and the editing was not apparent. What utter bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFriendlyAnarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. I noticed that too. They weren't even subtle about it, so I wonder if they
were simply breaks in the interview? Surely if they were trying to cover something up they would have at least tried to make it flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. They had to keep stopping for Sarah Strangelove to check her flashcards
She dropped the Bush Doctrine one on the way to the studio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC