Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10 Conservative organizations that have been the most detrimental to human and civil rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 07:04 PM
Original message
10 Conservative organizations that have been the most detrimental to human and civil rights
Edited on Tue Mar-13-07 07:07 PM by ck4829
(Be honest, but gentle, with me. This is my first real thing I've written in a long time.)

I've based just how detrimental it is based on:
Connections to massacres
Trying to cover up massacres
Suppressing human and civil rights
Being chummy with dictators
Illegal activities
Trying to cover up illegal activities
Opposition to peace and/or wanting the perpetuation of warfare

Here's the list:

10. Free Enterprise Fund - After DeLay was indicted, this group led the charge in trying to smear Ronnie Earle, the prosecutor in the case

9. Free Congress Foundation - This group actively rejected detente and arms control

8. Family Research Institute - Hate group led by discredited researcher Paul Cameron, but being discredited doesn't stop homophobes from using his research in an effort to suppress freedom for GLBT people

7. Clear Channel Communications - After 9/11, they blacklisted several songs and groups. They also led pro-war rallies leading up to the invasion of Iraq

6. Traditional Values Coalition - Suspected of trying to throw balloons filled with urine at people at a rally and also connected to the suppression of GLBT people

5. Progress for America - Made ads supportive of the invasion of Iraq

4. American Enterprise Institute - The brains behind Bush's escalation of the forces in Iraq

3. Accuracy in Media - Our first truly bad group, tried to cover up the El Mozote Massacre by accusing the people who exposed it as having political motives for doing so, it turned out however that a thousand men, women, and children were indeed brutally murdered by a death squad in El Salvador, they also supported the Pinochet regime

2. Heritage Foundation - Supported UNITA, the Contras, and some religious fanatics in Afghanistan in their struggle against the USSR (That never came back and hit us, right?)

1. Republican Party - All these abuses would not have been possible without the aid of the Republican Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. i'm really glad you included Free congress because many have never heard of them and their lunatic
leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good list.
You ought to buy ad space in newspapers and produce it there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. how about
the Hoover institute. Guess you can't have all of them in the top ten but they are bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Nuts Ruining America
Edited on Tue Mar-13-07 07:14 PM by billbuckhead

When a man is in trouble or in a good fight, you want to have your friends around, preferably armed. So I feel really good."
<http://www.talkleft.com/story/2005/04/17/861/12140>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Another thing to add about Clear Channel: They own the rights to Limbaugh.
And O'Reilly. And Hannity. And every other republican shill who brainwashes the masses and allows them (and these other groups you mentioned) to get away with all the evil shit that they do.

Otherwise, good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Upon today's news maybe AIPAC would make the cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Couple of alternative ideas
Edited on Tue Mar-13-07 07:24 PM by Warpy
Eagle Forum, founded as a backlash to all the civil rights progress of the 60s, they've fought laws that protect women, laws that protect children, and laws that protect the environment. Phylis Schlafly is their mentor, nuff said. Plus, Dobson is one of their darlings.

Concerned Women for America, a mostly male run right wing organization with a few women shills that is allergic to civil rights and reproductive freedom. Founded by Beverly LaHaye (whose husband Timothy is famous for those silly "Left Behind" books). They're basically the Dominionist and Christian Reconstructionist political arm.

These are much worse than #5 and #6 because they've been doing evil things to our civil liberties for years; the Eagle Forum for decades.

Throwing urine at people may be reprehensible, but it's small potatoes compared to the damage these two groups have done. Likewise, supporting the war doesn't compare.

I strongly suggest reconsidering #5 and #6 if you want to restrict the number. These people are far worse. The others are spot on.

http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=22376

http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=3152
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. And these are the top 10 groups to draft into the army, since they have
permanent hard ons for war.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clear Channel did not blacklist any songs or groups after 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They just provided a lits of songs...
that people shouldn't play. Because it'd be "inappropriate." Nudge nudge, wink wink.

Sounds like blacklisting to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. They didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Read it again.
They did provide a list, and told people it was inappropriate to play it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. What article are you reading?
A single program director at a single CC radio station compiled the list and forwarded it around as a suggestion. Clear Channel as a corporate body did nothing of the sort and didn't ratify the PD's actions. He acted alone and was promptly ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronyraurus Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Let me guess
You won't admit that you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't forget the Federalist Society
the real group od 'activist judges' who groom candidates for the bench who belive in unconstitutional crap like 'the unitary executive"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Federalist Society replaced American Bar Assn. for vetting judges /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Add to the list the Supreme Court





A detrimental conservative outfit if there ever was one.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. Er...I'm not sure Clear Channel has done enough...
..to warrant being on that list, at least in terms of the example you cite.

Club For Growth: major conservative fundraising machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. Add "Progress for America" to the list of most Ironic names, as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC