Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cal Thomas: RW'ers attacking Clinton, but not Republicans, for infidelity is not hypocrisy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:31 AM
Original message
Cal Thomas: RW'ers attacking Clinton, but not Republicans, for infidelity is not hypocrisy
But instead they are 'maturing'.

"One has to wonder just what world right-wing commentator Cal Thomas inhabits. The fact that the Right is resoundingly under-whelmed and dismayed by the current crop of GOP presidential frontrunners is not to be taken as a sign that their influence may be waning, but rather as sign that “Conservative Evangelical Christian voters” are supposedly “maturing” in their political outlook:

Conservative Evangelical Christian voters have come a long way in a short time. From their nearly unanimous condemnation of Bill Clinton for his extramarital affairs, a growing number of these “pro-family” voters appear ready to accept several Republican presidential candidates who do not share their ideal of marriage and faith.

Thomas then goes on to recount the various infidelities of Rudy Giuliani, Newt Gingrich, and John McCain before concluding

That substantial numbers of conservative evangelical voters are even considering these candidates as presidential prospects is a sign of their political maturation and of their more pragmatic view of what can be expected from politics and politicians.

Seeing as these men are widely considered to be among the GOP’s frontrunner and that the first Republican presidential primary is still almost a year away, these voters don’t really have much choice but to consider these candidates at this point. Nonetheless, according to the most recent New York Times/CBS News poll, they don’t seem too happy about it..."

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/03/the_maturing_ri.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hate the Sin but love the Sinner
unless he's Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. For repukes it's Love the sin, hate the sinner.
That's why it's called hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Henry Hyde's youthful indiscretions. Gingrich had about 18 years with each
of 2 wives. How old was Giuliani when he settled on no. 3?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, that's a interesting spin on the Seventh Commandment
Thou shall not commit adultery. Republicans excepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. IOW Right Wingers have been a bunch of immature whiners for over a decade
But now they have matured and found that their reading of the Bible is no longer important unless of course they canuse it to attack a Democrat..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. And why should I care what Cal Thomas thinks?
He's just another immature whiny hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. I *might* buy this argument IF
RW nutjobs weren't STILL using the Monica case to attack Bill Clinton at every possible instance.
But they are -- and this is just another spin job by a RW mouthpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of course, it's not hypocrisy
Jesus himself only condemned adultery during non-election years or when it looked like his political party was safe.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Media ignores what RR Leaders
are saying. Both R. Land, Top Official Southern Baptist
Convention and also Leader of Family ResearcH Council
on C. Matthews Hardball Monday.
Essentially stated Guilliani as "unnacceptable".
Both agreed that having Candidateswith 3 marriages and
ugly divorces gives the Democrats ammunition to
call us hypocrites especially after our attacks
on Bill Clinton.

If you closely examine Cal Thomas's last sentence,
they are not happy with their choices. He, too.
sees the problem for the Republican Base. On
the Fox Newswatch program Thomas indicated that
being pragmatic on these marriage issues can leave
Republicans looking like hypocrites.

Are they trying to change the image of the Republican
Party--not so "religious" and more moderate.
Right now, I have no idea. I find it interesting
that they seem to ignore players like the Southern
Baptist Convention and the Family Research Council.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC