MattBaggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 12:34 PM
Original message |
| Security(?) problem with Ratings system |
|
Made a test account and found that even though you can't make new posts you can rate them. Shouldn't there be a minimum number of posts needed to rate? Isn't this just opening the door up wide and begging the freekers to come over and disrupt us?
|
| Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Won't disruptors just make the minimum number of posts required- and then do it anyway? |
| unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. no security feature stops the really determined. the idea is to deter the merely determined. |
| MattBaggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. Not if you make it harsh enough |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 12:48 PM by MattBaggins
Perhaps 500 or more posts
Might be best to make some meta-raters. Some way to stop stupid people from rating.
|
| unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. hmm. maybe you should expect about 1,000 "disruptive" recommendations! |
| Karenina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-25-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
